ECS H81H3-M4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics43.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive56.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory10GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 10GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardECS H81H3-M4  (all builds)
Memory5.5 GB free of 10 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140513
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateFeb 24 '23 at 05:15
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User ARG-User
Background CPU10%
Watch Gameplay: 480 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790S-$60
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
72% Very good
Memory 81.9
1-Core 104
2-Core 190
72% 125 Pts
4-Core 340
8-Core 456
50% 398 Pts
64-Core 508
31% 508 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 72%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 480-$75
CLim: 1303 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.11.2
Performing below potential (39th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
43.8% Average
Lighting 56.3
Reflection 61.4
Parallax 84
46% 67.2 fps
MRender 63.9
Gravity 38.6
Splatting 45.5
40% 49.3 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 43.8%
Great: 53%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
29GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S1Z40102
SusWrite @10s intervals: 281 219 84 78 120 38 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
56.6% Above average
Read 479
Write 424
Mixed 420
SusWrite 137
82% 365 MB/s
4K Read 32
4K Write 78.3
4K Mixed 0.6
91% 37 MB/s
DQ Read 207
DQ Write 10.9
DQ Mixed 1.2
28% 73.2 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 56.6%
Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5471-054.A00LF 10GB
1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 2048 MB
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
47.4% Average
MC Read 16.4
MC Write 17.9
MC Mixed 14.8
47% 16.4 GB/s
SC Read 11.3
SC Write 17.5
SC Mixed 13.1
40% 14 GB/s
Latency 77.1
52% 77.1 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 47.4%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H81H3-M4 Builds (Compare 991 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: ECS H81H3-M4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $178
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback