Asus ASUS TUF Gaming F17 FX707ZE_FX707ZE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 66%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 67%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics71.3% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive102% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAsus ASUS TUF Gaming F17 FX707ZE_FX707ZE  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FX707ZE
Memory0.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit색,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220617
Uptime5.8 Days
Run DateFeb 25 '23 at 07:01
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU 20%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-12700H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
91.8% Outstanding
Memory 68.1
1-Core 173
2-Core 338
100% 193 Pts
4-Core 619
8-Core 958
97% 788 Pts
64-Core 1,538
95% 1,538 Pts
Poor: 91%
This bench: 91.8%
Great: 102%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3050-Ti (Laptop)
Asus(1043 1D4C) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.1691
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
71.3% Very good
Lighting 96.7
Reflection 84.2
Parallax 86.4
79% 89.1 fps
MRender 76.6
Gravity 70.5
Splatting 63.6
57% 70.2 fps
Poor: 42%
This bench: 71.3%
Great: 72%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme INTEL SSDPEKNU512GZ 512GB
256GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 19 959 854 24 48 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 943
Write 1,058
Mixed 53.1
SusWrite 320
132% 594 MB/s
4K Read 52.5
4K Write 14.9
4K Mixed 28.7
124% 32 MB/s
DQ Read 319
DQ Write 28
DQ Mixed 51.5
68% 133 MB/s
Poor: 99%
This bench: 102%
Great: 297%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M425R1GB4BB0-CQKOD 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
50.3% Above average
MC Read 19.5
MC Write 17.3
MC Mixed 17.1
51% 18 GB/s
SC Read 13.3
SC Write 15.1
SC Mixed 15.8
42% 14.7 GB/s
Latency 106
38% 106 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 50.3%
Great: 74%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ASUS TUF Gaming F17 FX707ZE_FX707ZE Builds (Compare 133 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 66%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 69%
Battle cruiser

System: Asus ASUS TUF Gaming F17 FX707ZE_FX707ZE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback