HP 280 G1 MT

Performance Results


Gaming 21% Surfboard	Desktop 74% Battleship	Workstation 17% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	24.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	40% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

14 months ago, 14 months ago.

System	HP 280 G1 MT (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 2B34
Memory	9.6 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit barev
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140929
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Feb 25 '23 at 14:39
Run Duration	128 Seconds
Run User	CZE-User
Background CPU	28%

PC Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4460-$194 245,403 User benchmarks, average bench 62% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	64.8% Good	Memory 80.7 1-Core 93.1 2-Core 177 68% 117 Pts	4-Core 281 8-Core 298 38% 290 Pts	64-Core 304 19% 304 Pts
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 64.8% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 760-$209 161,132 User benchmarks, average bench 26% Asus(1043 8487) 2GB CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 474.14 Performing below potential (40^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	24.9% Poor	Lighting 28.2 Reflection 31 Parallax 35.7 23% 31.6 fps	MRender 39.5 Gravity 36.8 Splatting 30.2 28% 35.5 fps
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 24.9% Great: 28%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk U100 64GB 381 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 14GB free (System drive) Firmware: CS.51.00 SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 100 173 167 155 132 MB/s Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	40% Average	Read 422 Write 201 Mixed 142 SusWrite 144 50% 227 MB/s	4K Read 17.8 4K Write 9.4 4K Mixed 10 45% 12.4 MB/s	DQ Read 32.8 DQ Write 9.7 DQ Mixed 12 11% 18.2 MB/s
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 40% Great: 46%
WD WD3200YS-01PGB0 320GB 1,147 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 231GB free Firmware: 21.00M21 SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 59 59 59 60 60 MB/s Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	34.4% Below average	Read 60.5 Write 61.1 Mixed 47.8 SusWrite 58.8 42% 57 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 1 181% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 34.4% Great: 36%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99U5584-005.A00LF Samsung M378B1G73DB0-CK0 12GB 12 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 8192 MB Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	54.1% Above average	MC Read 19.5 MC Write 20.9 MC Mixed 17.2 55% 19.2 GB/s	SC Read 13.7 SC Write 17.9 SC Mixed 12.9 42% 14.8 GB/s	Latency 79.3 50% 79.3 ns
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 54.1% Great: 54%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 280 G1 MT Builds (Compare 1,145 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 3%

Tree trunk

Desktop 56%

Gunboat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: HP 280 G1 MT

CPU
Core i3-4160Intel $79Bench 55%, 48,506 samples	293x
Core i5-4590SIntel $79Bench 67%, 11,598 samples	258x
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples	146x

GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	221x
HD 4400 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 64,721 samples	220x
HD Graphics (G4 Pentium/Celeron 1.05/1.15 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 43,454 samples	84x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	39x
Green 240GB (2018)WD $35Bench 45%, 156,194 samples	38x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	25x

RAM
M378B5173EB0-YK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 27%, 3,229 samples	65x
HMT351U6CFR8C-PB 2x4GBHynixBench 53%, 17,809 samples	35x
M378B5173EB0-YK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 50%, 4,222 samples	31x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 42% - Average

Total price: $194

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $160	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16