Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF GAMING Z790-PLUS WIFI D4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 505%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 126%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 599%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 130%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics410% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (45%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING Z790-PLUS WIFI D4  (all builds)
Memory39 GB free of 48 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220907
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 26 '23 at 00:39
Run Duration220 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 45%

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-13700K-$273
LGA1700, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 5.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
130% Outstanding
Memory 89.4
1-Core 228
2-Core 454
133% 257 Pts
4-Core 908
8-Core 1,664
154% 1,286 Pts
64-Core 3,210
199% 3,210 Pts
Poor: 120%
This bench: 130%
Great: 131%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4090-$1,802
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 528.49
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
410% Outstanding
Lighting 664
Reflection 604
Parallax 741
541% 670 fps
MRender 554
Gravity 590
Splatting 313
380% 486 fps
Poor: 290%
This bench: 410%
Great: 402%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 950 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$150
30GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B0QBXX7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,648
Write 685
Mixed 545
209% 959 MB/s
4K Read 44.6
4K Write 218
4K Mixed 56.8
256% 106 MB/s
DQ Read 1,070
DQ Write 289
DQ Mixed 381
358% 580 MB/s
Poor: 131% Great: 243%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$100
256GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1560 1291 1290 1098 1106 1106 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
362% Outstanding
Read 2,371
Write 2,130
Mixed 1,546
SusWrite 1,242
408% 1,822 MB/s
4K Read 62.7
4K Write 204
4K Mixed 91.8
320% 119 MB/s
DQ Read 2,264
DQ Write 1,912
DQ Mixed 1,982
1,514% 2,053 MB/s
Poor: 214%
This bench: 362%
Great: 372%
Samsung 870 EVO 2TB-$170
1TB free
Firmware: SVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 307 351 417 470 482 483 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
122% Outstanding
Read 471
Write 425
Mixed 409
SusWrite 418
97% 431 MB/s
4K Read 39.7
4K Write 118
4K Mixed 60.2
200% 72.5 MB/s
DQ Read 373
DQ Write 321
DQ Mixed 343
258% 346 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 122%
Great: 136%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$30
386GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 123 123 125 127 124 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
77.8% Very good
Read 148
Write 148
Mixed 102
SusWrite 123
96% 130 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1.1
227% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 77.8%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMK32GX4M2E3200C16 G Skill Intl F4-3000C15-8GVKB CMK32GX4M2E3200C16 G Skill Intl F4-3000C15-8GVKB 48GB
3200, 3200, 3200, 3200 MHz
16384, 8192, 16384, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
111% Outstanding
MC Read 41.4
MC Write 39.8
MC Mixed 38.4
114% 39.9 GB/s
SC Read 28
SC Write 42.8
SC Mixed 34.6
100% 35.1 GB/s
Latency 68
59% 68 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 111%
Great: 111%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING Z790-PLUS WIFI D4 Builds (Compare 3,044 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 289%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 122%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 345%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING Z790-PLUS WIFI D4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 101% - Outstanding Total price: $1,155
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $330
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback