HP EliteBook 725 G2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 30%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 27.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics3.05% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive48% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP EliteBook 725 G2  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 221D
Memory8.8 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit färger
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160926
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 24 '17 at 13:16
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU 34%

 PC Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10 PRO-7350B R6, 10 Compute Cores 4C+6G
Socket FS1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 1.7 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
27.4% Poor
Memory 44.9
1-Core 32.1
2-Core 49.7
28% 42.2 Pts
4-Core 56.8
8-Core 71.8
8% 64.3 Pts
64-Core 57.2
4% 57.2 Pts
Poor: 21%
This bench: 27.4%
Great: 38%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
HP(103C 221D) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 17.11.1
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
3.05% Terrible
Lighting 3.43
Reflection 5
Parallax 3.94
3% 4.12 fps
MRender 4.57
Gravity 2.77
Splatting 5.26
4% 4.2 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.05%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 250GB-$251
105GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXT08B0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
48% Average
Read 452
Write 233
Mixed 172
63% 286 MB/s
4K Read 14.5
4K Write 20.8
4K Mixed 10.1
46% 15.1 MB/s
DQ Read 47.7
DQ Write 36.3
DQ Mixed 22.4
22% 35.5 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 48%
Great: 85%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 16KTF1G64HZ-1G6E1 Samsung M471B5173BH0-CK0 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
20.3% Poor
MC Read 9.7
MC Write 6
MC Mixed 8.2
23% 7.97 GB/s
SC Read 0.3
SC Write 3.2
SC Mixed 0.8
4% 1.43 GB/s
Latency 181
22% 181 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 20.3%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EliteBook 725 G2 Builds (Compare 20 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 32%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteBook 725 G2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback