Lenovo 20N2002AUS

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics3.93% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (75%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemLenovo 20N2002AUS  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20N2002AUS
Memory3.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221014
Uptime4.2 Days
Run DateFeb 27 '23 at 04:00
Run Duration220 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 75%

 PC Performing below expectations (20th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8565U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
39.2% Below average
Memory 55
1-Core 41.9
2-Core 81.2
37% 59.4 Pts
4-Core 134
8-Core 150
19% 142 Pts
64-Core 192
12% 192 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 39.2%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620
Legend(17AA 2279) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1692
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
3.93% Terrible
Lighting 4.2
Reflection 3.9
Parallax 5
3% 4.37 fps
MRender 6.4
Gravity 4.5
Splatting 6.8
5% 5.9 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.93%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SKHynix_HFS512GD9TNG-L5B0B 512GB
312GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 80750C10
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 880
Write 835
Mixed 912
196% 876 MB/s
4K Read 25.8
4K Write 42.7
4K Mixed 31.5
102% 33.3 MB/s
DQ Read 319
DQ Write 168
DQ Mixed 184
153% 224 MB/s
Poor: 111% Great: 225%
SanDisk Ultra Fit 64GB
48GB free, PID null
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 113
Write 29.7
Mixed 41
63% 61.3 MB/s
4K Read 3.3
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 1.8
108% 2.03 MB/s
Poor: 11% Great: 38%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATS1G64HZ-2G6E1 Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD 16GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
47.3% Average
MC Read 19
MC Write 18.9
MC Mixed 15.7
51% 17.9 GB/s
SC Read 6.4
SC Write 13.7
SC Mixed 11.2
30% 10.4 GB/s
Latency 143
28% 143 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 47.3%
Great: 83%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 20N2002AUS Builds (Compare 11 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20N2002AUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to market inferior products. UserBenchmark's data challenges the marketing and exposes the youtubers' biases.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback