HP Laptop 15-da0xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics9.63% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive63.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
16 months ago, 15 months ago.
SystemHP Laptop 15-da0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 84A7
Memory9.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20221116
Uptime3.9 Days
Run DateMar 02 '23 at 10:54
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User AUT-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8250U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 1.95 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
45.9% Average
Memory 60.3
1-Core 102
2-Core 83.3
53% 81.7 Pts
4-Core 177
8-Core 220
26% 198 Pts
64-Core 216
13% 216 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 45.9%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia MX130
HP(103C 84A7) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 30.0.15.1278
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
9.63% Terrible
Lighting 12.5
Reflection 10.9
Parallax 11.8
10% 11.7 fps
MRender 11.2
Gravity 12.4
Splatting 8.5
8% 10.7 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 9.63%
Great: 10%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS500G2B0A-00SM50 500GB
257GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 411030WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 259 259 255 252 259 258 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
63.4% Good
Read 408
Write 261
Mixed 231
SusWrite 257
65% 289 MB/s
4K Read 14.6
4K Write 35.6
4K Mixed 21.6
69% 23.9 MB/s
DQ Read 243
DQ Write 202
DQ Mixed 195
153% 213 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 63.4%
Great: 111%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata AO1P24HC8T1-BPGS Corsair CMSO8GX4M1A2133C15 16GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
45.1% Average
MC Read 16.7
MC Write 18.2
MC Mixed 15.4
48% 16.8 GB/s
SC Read 6.9
SC Write 13.5
SC Mixed 10.7
30% 10.4 GB/s
Latency 127
32% 127 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 45.1%
Great: 68%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Laptop 15-da0xxx Builds (Compare 4,891 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: HP Laptop 15-da0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $158
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback