Today's hottest deals

Asrock H61M-HP4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.35% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive37% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock H61M-HP4  (all builds)
Memory4.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130509
Uptime1.7 Days
Run DateMar 02 '23 at 14:58
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 21%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-3240
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
53% Above average
Memory 69.3
1-Core 63.5
2-Core 145
54% 92.7 Pts
4-Core 213
8-Core 216
29% 215 Pts
64-Core 214
13% 214 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 53%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)
ASRock(1849 0152) 2.2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4252
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
1.35% Terrible
Lighting 1.5
Reflection 1
Parallax 1.4
1% 1.3 fps
MRender 3
Gravity 1
Splatting 1.9
2% 1.97 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.35%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Patriot Burst Elite 120GB
73GB free (System drive)
Firmware: U0401A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 96 76 56 39 39 MB/s
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
37% Below average
Read 252
Write 229
Mixed 83.5
SusWrite 72.3
35% 159 MB/s
4K Read 18.2
4K Write 49.8
4K Mixed 1
55% 23 MB/s
DQ Read 179
DQ Write 167
DQ Mixed 1.1
48% 116 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 37%
Great: 91%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$50
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 187 184 188 187 187 188 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
110% Outstanding
Read 198
Write 154
Mixed 72.5
SusWrite 187
112% 153 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
151% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 110%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 0194 SH564128FH8N6TNFQG 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
37.1% Below average
MC Read 12.8
MC Write 12.6
MC Mixed 12.5
36% 12.6 GB/s
SC Read 11.4
SC Write 12.5
SC Mixed 12.3
34% 12.1 GB/s
Latency 103
39% 103 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 37.1%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H61M-HP4 Builds (Compare 35 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock H61M-HP4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $346
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $365
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback