Gigabyte GA-B450 AORUS ELITE

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 52%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 49%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics65.8% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
16 months ago, 16 months ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B450 AORUS ELITE  (all builds)
Memory10.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220720
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMar 03 '23 at 22:23
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User ARG-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 1660 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$84
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
78.3% Very good
Memory 73.5
1-Core 130
2-Core 248
82% 151 Pts
4-Core 446
8-Core 738
72% 592 Pts
64-Core 905
56% 905 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 78.3%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-$209
Nvidia(10DE 2184) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 531.18
Performing below potential (30th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
65.8% Good
Lighting 87.4
Reflection 82.8
Parallax 72.2
71% 80.8 fps
MRender 60.9
Gravity 74.5
Splatting 66.5
55% 67.3 fps
Poor: 62%
This bench: 65.8%
Great: 73%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$149
85GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 211070WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,557
Write 1,704
Mixed 1,357
344% 1,539 MB/s
4K Read 46.7
4K Write 160
4K Mixed 71.4
247% 92.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1,209
DQ Write 796
DQ Mixed 951
724% 986 MB/s
Poor: 164% Great: 276%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
204GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 133 134 133 134 134 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
89% Excellent
Read 176
Write 167
Mixed 92.6
SusWrite 134
104% 142 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.2
239% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 89%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BLS8G4D240FSEK.8FBD BLS8G4D240FSCK.8FBD 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
69.7% Good
MC Read 29.8
MC Write 17.8
MC Mixed 28
72% 25.2 GB/s
SC Read 19
SC Write 16.4
SC Mixed 25.5
58% 20.3 GB/s
Latency 93.6
43% 93.6 ns
Poor: 70%
This bench: 69.7%
Great: 90%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-B450 AORUS ELITE Builds (Compare 11,203 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B450 AORUS ELITE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 92% - Outstanding Total price: $420
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback