Asus WS-C621E-SAGE Series

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 101%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics101% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive277% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
16 months ago, 15 months ago.
SystemAsus WS-C621E-SAGE Series  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK WS-C621E-SAGE Series
Memory121.6 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, , 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220426
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 04 '23 at 06:46
Run Duration154 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon Gold 6150
CPU1, 1 CPU, 18 cores, 36 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
75.7% Very good
Memory 73.7
1-Core 109
2-Core 206
73% 130 Pts
4-Core 417
8-Core 832
74% 624 Pts
64-Core 2,244
139% 2,244 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 75.7%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$226
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing below potential (62nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
101% Outstanding
Lighting 133
Reflection 120
Parallax 122
108% 125 fps
MRender 141
Gravity 105
Splatting 89.9
89% 112 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 101%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Microsoft Storage Space Device 30TB
20.5TB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 242 233 236 240 248 239 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
27.1% Poor
Read 235
Write 228
Mixed 114
SusWrite 240
46% 204 MB/s
4K Read 1.9
4K Write 10.3
4K Mixed 1.2
10% 4.47 MB/s
DQ Read 4.2
DQ Write 5.2
DQ Mixed 5.9
4% 5.1 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 27.1%
Great: 31%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$159
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1646 1633 1632 1612 1608 1607 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
277% Outstanding
Read 1,824
Write 1,674
Mixed 1,597
SusWrite 1,623
378% 1,680 MB/s
4K Read 59.2
4K Write 105
4K Mixed 76.1
243% 80 MB/s
DQ Read 746
DQ Write 541
DQ Mixed 667
492% 651 MB/s
Poor: 223%
This bench: 277%
Great: 435%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 16TB
11.5TB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 43 39 48 38 44 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
12.7% Very poor
Read 66.6
Write 109
Mixed 107
SusWrite 53.4
19% 84.1 MB/s
4K Read 2
4K Write 33.9
4K Mixed 1.7
23% 12.5 MB/s
DQ Read 3.6
DQ Write 8.6
DQ Mixed 2.2
3% 4.8 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 12.7%
Great: 106%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Apacer 78.D1GSA.4050B 78.D1GSA.4050B 78.D1GSA.4050B 78.D1GSA.4050B Samsung M393A2K43CB2-CTD Samsung M393A2K43CB2-CTD Samsung M393A2K43CB2-CTD Samsung M393A2K43CB2-CTD 128GB
2666, 2666, 2666, 2666, 2666, 2666, 2666, 2666 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
117% Outstanding
MC Read 43
MC Write 60.8
MC Mixed 42.8
140% 48.9 GB/s
SC Read 8.2
SC Write 7.1
SC Mixed 6.9
21% 7.4 GB/s
Latency 93.2
43% 93.2 ns
Poor: 115%
This bench: 117%
Great: 117%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical WS-C621E-SAGE Series Builds (Compare 152 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 157%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 213%
UFO

System: Asus WS-C621E-SAGE Series

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $1,106
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback