HP 550-130z

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 32%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (14th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 86 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 15.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics16.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive29.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
16 months ago, 16 months ago.
SystemHP 550-130z  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 2B52
Memory13.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150805
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 05 '23 at 05:25
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A6-8550 Radeon R5, 6 Compute Cores 2C+4G
P0, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
15.6% Very poor
Memory 19.4
1-Core 46.1
2-Core 66.1
24% 43.9 Pts
4-Core 68.4
8-Core 68.7
9% 68.6 Pts
64-Core 70.6
4% 70.6 Pts
Poor: 16%
This bench: 15.6%
Great: 45%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R7 360-$100
CLim: 1000 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 22.6.1
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
16.8% Very poor
Lighting 19.8
Reflection 24.8
Parallax 26.2
16% 23.6 fps
MRender 23.1
Gravity 20.2
Splatting 22.9
18% 22.1 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 16.8%
Great: 20%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU635 240GB-$20
173GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P190710b
SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 143 121 131 141 149 MB/s
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
29.1% Poor
Read 262
Write 161
Mixed 160
SusWrite 138
40% 180 MB/s
4K Read 5.6
4K Write 12.7
4K Mixed 6.5
24% 8.27 MB/s
DQ Read 72
DQ Write 61.1
DQ Mixed 93.3
63% 75.5 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 29.1%
Great: 97%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B1G73DB0-CK0 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
17.9% Very poor
MC Read 6.7
MC Write 5.5
MC Mixed 7.3
19% 6.5 GB/s
SC Read 3.4
SC Write 4.3
SC Mixed 6.7
14% 4.8 GB/s
Latency 325
12% 325 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 17.9%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 550-130z Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: HP 550-130z

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 50% - Average Total price: $255
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback