Today's hottest deals

Asus Z170 PRO GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 68%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics118% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive202% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus Z170 PRO GAMING  (all builds)
Memory7.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170315
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 07 '23 at 10:48
Run Duration167 Seconds
Run User BGD-User
Background CPU 100%
Watch Gameplay: 2070S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700-$130
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
68.4% Good
Memory 77.7
1-Core 103
2-Core 181
70% 121 Pts
4-Core 321
8-Core 454
49% 388 Pts
64-Core 539
33% 539 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 68.4%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$387
Zotac(19DA 5510) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 528.49
Performing below potential (71st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
118% Outstanding
Lighting 154
Reflection 153
Parallax 151
125% 152 fps
MRender 184
Gravity 133
Splatting 117
115% 145 fps
Poor: 105%
This bench: 118%
Great: 123%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HP EX900 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$41
375GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V0210A0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1091 1212 1243 1312 1299 1275 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
202% Outstanding
Read 1,426
Write 1,277
Mixed 998
SusWrite 1,238
278% 1,235 MB/s
4K Read 38.9
4K Write 122
4K Mixed 27
158% 62.5 MB/s
DQ Read 570
DQ Write 489
DQ Mixed 433
351% 498 MB/s
Poor: 116%
This bench: 202%
Great: 248%
Netac MobileDataStar 240GB
169GB free
Firmware: 1301
SusWrite @10s intervals: 269 277 277 274 293 323 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
47.3% Average
Read 276
Write 265
Mixed 268
SusWrite 286
62% 274 MB/s
4K Read 15.5
4K Write 28.2
4K Mixed 11.1
53% 18.3 MB/s
DQ Read 69
DQ Write 72.3
DQ Mixed 25.6
32% 55.6 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 47.3%
Great: 67%
WD Green 120GB (2016)-$84
98GB free
Firmware: Z3311000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 156 106 86 81 89 83 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
64.6% Good
Read 400
Write 386
Mixed 337
SusWrite 100
68% 306 MB/s
4K Read 23.8
4K Write 87.4
4K Mixed 23.1
112% 44.8 MB/s
DQ Read 157
DQ Write 251
DQ Mixed 30.7
72% 146 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 64.6%
Great: 71%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$54
937GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.4 8.2 9 9.7 7.5 9.7 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
4.19% Terrible
Read 6
Write 16.7
Mixed 6.5
SusWrite 8.6
7% 9.45 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.1
15% 0.07 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 4.19%
Great: 106%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata G.SKILL F4-2400C15-8GNT 16GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
56.4% Above average
MC Read 22.9
MC Write 21
MC Mixed 18.5
59% 20.8 GB/s
SC Read 10
SC Write 15.1
SC Mixed 12.7
36% 12.6 GB/s
Latency 84.9
47% 84.9 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 56.4%
Great: 71%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z170 PRO GAMING Builds (Compare 14,709 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus Z170 PRO GAMING - $295

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $840
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback