Biostar TA75M

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics30.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive42.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardBiostar TA75M  (all builds)
Memory12 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120412
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 26 '17 at 00:56
Run Duration187 Seconds
Run User CRI-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-3870 APU-$81
P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
54% Above average
Memory 77.7
1-Core 44.6
2-Core 92.4
46% 71.6 Pts
4-Core 178
8-Core 180
24% 179 Pts
64-Core 178
11% 178 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 54%
Great: 56%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 270X-$199
PowerColor(148C 2336) 2GB
CLim: 1100 MHz, MLim: 1425 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 17.1.1
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
30.4% Below average
Lighting 38.5
Reflection 34.4
Parallax 50
31% 41 fps
MRender 30.5
Gravity 32.1
Splatting 39.4
28% 34 fps
Poor: 25%
This bench: 30.4%
Great: 29%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk SSD Plus 120GB-$42
55GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z32080RL Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
42.4% Average
Read 476
Write 68.6
Mixed 290
61% 278 MB/s
4K Read 12
4K Write 41.8
4K Mixed 5.75
48% 19.9 MB/s
DQ Read 147
DQ Write 103
DQ Mixed 7
37% 85.6 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 42.4%
Great: 78%
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$25
160GB free
Firmware: MS1OA750 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
80.5% Excellent
Read 139
Write 142
Mixed 146
107% 142 MB/s
4K Read 0.53
4K Write 1.77
4K Mixed 0.19
77% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 80.5%
Great: 103%
Hitachi HTS545032B9SA02 320GB
88GB free
Firmware: PB3AC60W Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
35.4% Below average
Read 62.3
Write 61
Mixed 52.1
44% 58.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.42
4K Write 1.26
4K Mixed 0.22
65% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 35.4%
Great: 44%
Hitachi HTS545032B9SA02 320GB
88GB free
Firmware: PB3AC60W Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
40% Average
Read 80.3
Write 59.1
Mixed 59.3
50% 66.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.29
4K Write 1.18
4K Mixed 0.33
71% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 40%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 9U5471-032.A00LF 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 933 MHz
Performing below potential (80th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
38% Below average
MC Read 16.2
MC Write 13.2
MC Mixed 11.3
39% 13.6 GB/s
SC Read 7.5
SC Write 8
SC Mixed 9
23% 8.17 GB/s
Latency 85
47% 85 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 38%
Great: 38%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TA75M Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Biostar TA75M

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 35% - Below average Total price: $281
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback