Today's hottest deals

Asus Vivobook_ASUSLaptop X3400PH_K3400PH

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics27.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive270% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus Vivobook_ASUSLaptop X3400PH_K3400PH  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X3400PH
Memory3.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2880 x 1800 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210723
Uptime32.4 Days
Run DateMar 09 '23 at 19:22
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User AZE-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-11300H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
70.3% Very good
Memory 69.2
1-Core 137
2-Core 218
79% 141 Pts
4-Core 384
8-Core 593
60% 488 Pts
64-Core 172
11% 172 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 70.3%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design
Asus(1043 189C) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.2756
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
27.5% Poor
Lighting 30.8
Reflection 42.3
Parallax 37
25% 36.7 fps
MRender 50.2
Gravity 33.2
Splatting 36.5
32% 40 fps
Poor: 28%
This bench: 27.5%
Great: 39%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme INTEL SSDPEKNU512GZ 512GB
429GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 649 516 898 992 1063 1316 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
270% Outstanding
Read 2,268
Write 1,420
Mixed 1,180
SusWrite 906
321% 1,443 MB/s
4K Read 67.3
4K Write 176
4K Mixed 85
304% 109 MB/s
DQ Read 448
DQ Write 925
DQ Mixed 409
390% 594 MB/s
Poor: 99%
This bench: 270%
Great: 297%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA851S6CJR6N-XN 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
67.4% Good
MC Read 27.3
MC Write 25.8
MC Mixed 20.7
70% 24.6 GB/s
SC Read 12.6
SC Write 28.4
SC Mixed 15.9
54% 19 GB/s
Latency 103
39% 103 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 67.4%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Vivobook_ASUSLaptop X3400PH_K3400PH Builds (Compare 349 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

System: Asus Vivobook_ASUSLaptop X3400PH_K3400PH

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback