Today's hottest deals

Asus ASUS TUF Dash F15 FX516PM_FX516PM

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 55%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 43%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics82.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
20 months ago, 20 months ago.
SystemAsus ASUS TUF Dash F15 FX516PM_FX516PM  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FX516PM
Memory15.6 GB free of 24 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230201
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 10 '23 at 20:17
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-11370H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
62.3% Good
Memory 69.1
1-Core 146
2-Core 203
79% 140 Pts
4-Core 321
8-Core 326
43% 323 Pts
64-Core 290
18% 290 Pts
Poor: 62%
This bench: 62.3%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060 (Laptop)
Asus(1043 16E2) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.3118
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
82.1% Excellent
Lighting 106
Reflection 111
Parallax 99.6
87% 106 fps
MRender 116
Gravity 82.6
Splatting 76.3
73% 91.6 fps
Poor: 67%
This bench: 82.1%
Great: 105%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme SAMSUNG MZVLQ512HBLU-00B00 1TB
289GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ECFM22.6 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 986 1276 834 866 407 508 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 934
Write 1,670
Mixed 1,035
SusWrite 813
252% 1,113 MB/s
4K Read 36
4K Write 164
4K Mixed 53.5
210% 84.6 MB/s
DQ Read 994
DQ Write 623
DQ Mixed 754
577% 790 MB/s
Nvme INTEL SSDPEKNW020T8 2TB
248GB free
Firmware: 004C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 231 733 677 157 735 1295 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
161% Outstanding
Read 645
Write 255
Mixed 663
SusWrite 638
124% 550 MB/s
4K Read 38.6
4K Write 153
4K Mixed 53.6
208% 81.7 MB/s
DQ Read 825
DQ Write 658
DQ Mixed 565
471% 683 MB/s
Poor: 133%
This bench: 161%
Great: 302%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATF1G64HZ-3G2E1 G Skill Intl F4-2666C19-16GRS 24GB
3200, 2667 MHz
8192, 16384 MB
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
61.3% Good
MC Read 18.8
MC Write 28
MC Mixed 18.8
62% 21.9 GB/s
SC Read 13.4
SC Write 27.9
SC Mixed 16.1
55% 19.1 GB/s
Latency 103
39% 103 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 61.3%
Great: 69%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ASUS TUF Dash F15 FX516PM_FX516PM Builds (Compare 5,880 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

System: Asus ASUS TUF Dash F15 FX516PM_FX516PM

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $320
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback