Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF GAMING Z590-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 123%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 112%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 124%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 109%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics110% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive116% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING Z590-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory28.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210427
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 10 '23 at 23:23
Run Duration167 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-11700KF-$537
LGA1200, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Memory 96.3
1-Core 174
2-Core 348
111% 206 Pts
4-Core 650
8-Core 1,185
110% 918 Pts
64-Core 1,649
102% 1,649 Pts
Poor: 94%
This bench: 109%
Great: 109%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$237
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 531.18
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (140 fps cap detected)
110% Outstanding
Lighting 140
Reflection 140
Parallax 140
114% 140 fps
MRender 138
Gravity 140
Splatting 128
110% 135 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 110%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SA2000M8250G 250GB
96GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S5Z42105
SusWrite @10s intervals: 351 251 210 198 188 190 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
116% Outstanding
Read 1,135
Write 348
Mixed 79.2
SusWrite 231
97% 448 MB/s
4K Read 33.1
4K Write 35
4K Mixed 42.9
124% 37 MB/s
DQ Read 316
DQ Write 444
DQ Mixed 319
258% 360 MB/s
Poor: 103%
This bench: 116%
Great: 236%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
98GB free
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 422 314 315 316 315 314 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 496
Write 469
Mixed 439
SusWrite 333
98% 434 MB/s
4K Read 33.5
4K Write 74.2
4K Mixed 45
148% 50.9 MB/s
DQ Read 374
DQ Write 319
DQ Mixed 340
256% 344 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 102%
Great: 129%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85
112GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 426 436 457 464 408 260 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 484
Write 458
Mixed 395
SusWrite 408
98% 436 MB/s
4K Read 35.8
4K Write 75.1
4K Mixed 46.1
153% 52.3 MB/s
DQ Read 372
DQ Write 318
DQ Mixed 339
256% 343 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 107%
Great: 134%
Corsair Force MP600 NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$167
509GB free
Firmware: EGFM13.0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2084 2146 2342 2415 2530 2536 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
321% Outstanding
Read 1,401
Write 988
Mixed 1,616
SusWrite 2,342
360% 1,587 MB/s
4K Read 40.5
4K Write 115
4K Mixed 59.5
199% 71.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1,598
DQ Write 1,118
DQ Mixed 1,288
980% 1,334 MB/s
Poor: 183%
This bench: 321%
Great: 496%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3600 C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
126% Outstanding
MC Read 47.1
MC Write 47
MC Mixed 41.8
129% 45.3 GB/s
SC Read 27.1
SC Write 49.3
SC Mixed 38.2
109% 38.2 GB/s
Latency 52.8
76% 52.8 ns
Poor: 70%
This bench: 126%
Great: 129%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING Z590-PLUS Builds (Compare 4,231 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 105%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 106%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 105%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING Z590-PLUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $612
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback