Pegatron H81-M1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics25.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive52.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemPegatron H81-M1  (all builds)
MotherboardPEGATRON H81-M1
Memory13.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150910
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 12 '23 at 07:01
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU 22%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4670-$62
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
65.3% Good
Memory 81.4
1-Core 63.4
2-Core 200
64% 115 Pts
4-Core 283
8-Core 301
39% 292 Pts
64-Core 339
21% 339 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 65.3%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 950-$100
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1652 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing below potential (51st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
25.2% Poor
Lighting 31
Reflection 36.9
Parallax 29.7
25% 32.5 fps
MRender 34.6
Gravity 31
Splatting 27.8
25% 31.1 fps
Poor: 22%
This bench: 25.2%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
CG-128 128GB
9GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SN05872
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 116 105 106 107 103 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
52.7% Above average
Read 367
Write 115
Mixed 148
SusWrite 104
40% 183 MB/s
4K Read 18.8
4K Write 68.6
4K Mixed 18.1
88% 35.2 MB/s
DQ Read 51
DQ Write 194
DQ Mixed 104
85% 116 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 52.7%
Great: 92%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$20
237GB free
Firmware: KC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 106 111 107 110 109 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
65.6% Good
Read 121
Write 128
Mixed 66.2
SusWrite 108
77% 106 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
131% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 65.6%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5273DH0-YKO 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
58.9% Above average
MC Read 21.5
MC Write 22.5
MC Mixed 18.3
59% 20.8 GB/s
SC Read 14.2
SC Write 19
SC Mixed 18.8
50% 17.3 GB/s
Latency 77.9
51% 77.9 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 58.9%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H81-M1 Builds (Compare 330 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Pegatron H81-M1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $203
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback