Today's hottest deals

Jingsha JINGS-X99-P8

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (14th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 86 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics40.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive43.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemJingsha JINGS-X99-P8  (all builds)
MotherboardJINGSHA JINGS-X99-P8
Memory57 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200915
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 13 '23 at 02:17
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User PER-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2683 v3
SOCKET 0, 2 CPU, 28 cores, 56 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
60.3% Good
Memory 69.3
1-Core 71
2-Core 144
56% 94.8 Pts
4-Core 277
8-Core 559
49% 418 Pts
64-Core 2,442
151% 2,442 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 60.3%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K6000-$4,000
HP(103C 1036) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 11.2GB, Driver: 353.30
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
40.2% Average
Lighting 47.6
Reflection 52.8
Parallax 69.8
39% 56.7 fps
MRender 62.2
Gravity 47.7
Splatting 49.2
43% 53 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 40.2%
Great: 47%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 120GB-$30
41GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0C3FD6SD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 188 61 59 54 57 54 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
43.2% Average
Read 436
Write 331
Mixed 104
SusWrite 78.9
52% 238 MB/s
4K Read 18.6
4K Write 27.1
4K Mixed 5.6
50% 17.1 MB/s
DQ Read 229
DQ Write 84.7
DQ Mixed 155
115% 156 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 43.2%
Great: 82%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M386A4G40DM0-CPB 2x31.5GB
2 of 24 slots used
63GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
33.7% Below average
MC Read 13.7
MC Write 10.1
MC Mixed 10.4
33% 11.4 GB/s
SC Read 10.3
SC Write 9.8
SC Mixed 12.1
31% 10.7 GB/s
Latency 103
39% 103 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 33.7%
Great: 69%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical JINGS-X99-P8 Builds (Compare 33 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 60%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 94%
Nuclear submarine

System: Jingsha JINGS-X99-P8

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 152% - Outstanding Total price: $140
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback