| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor. |
| Graphics | 3.5% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asrock N68C-GS4 FX (all builds) |
| Memory | 0.6 GB free of 2 GB @ 0.5 GHz |
| Display | 1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20141013 |
| Uptime | 0.4 Days |
| Run Date | Nov 26 '17 at 19:54 |
| Run Duration | 171 Seconds |
| Run User | UKR-User |
| Background CPU | 32% |
PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
36.7%
Below average
|
35% 51.7 Pts
|
8% 62.3 Pts
|
4% 71.3 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GeForce GT 710
Gigabyte(1458 36F8) 1GB
CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 361.75
|
3.5%
Terrible
|
3% 3.94 fps
|
4% 4.67 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
51%
Above average
|
67% 89.1 MB/s
|
88% 0.75 MB/s
| |
|
|
39.3%
Below average
|
46% 61.9 MB/s
|
35% 0.43 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Hynix HYMP125U64CP8-S6 1x2GB
1 of 2 slots used
2GB DIMM DDR2 533 MHz
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
10.5%
Very poor
|
9% 3.03 GB/s
|
7% 2.33 GB/s
|
34% 118 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical N68C-GS4 FX Builds (Compare 92 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock N68C-GS4 FX
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| FX-6300AMD $90Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 39x |
| FX-4300AMD $73Bench 52%, 55,454 samples | 8x |
| FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 3x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 11x |
| GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples | 6x |
| Radeon HD 5450AMDBench 1%, 66,079 samples | 6x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 92% - Outstanding | Total price: $149 |