Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-A5 K1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 90%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 82%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics89.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive130% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (39%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-A5 K1  (all builds)
Memory10.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220427
Uptime4 Days
Run DateMar 15 '23 at 00:09
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 39%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H
FP6, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
96.4% Outstanding
Memory 81
1-Core 18
2-Core 305
66% 135 Pts
4-Core 600
8-Core 893
93% 747 Pts
64-Core 1,040
64% 1,040 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 96.4%
Great: 93%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060 (Laptop)
Clevo(1558 50F2) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 531.18
Performing below potential (46th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
89.3% Excellent
Lighting 110
Reflection 146
Parallax 103
90% 120 fps
MRender 143
Gravity 103
Splatting 87
88% 111 fps
Poor: 67%
This bench: 89.3%
Great: 105%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
ESR512GTLCW-E6GBTNB4 512GB
185GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EGFM15.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 52 215 293 339 261 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
130% Outstanding
Read 1,003
Write 1,321
Mixed 131
SusWrite 203
148% 665 MB/s
4K Read 41.4
4K Write 58.3
4K Mixed 49.8
157% 49.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1,189
DQ Write 67.5
DQ Mixed 134
222% 463 MB/s
Poor: 130%
This bench: 130%
Great: 343%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43EB1-CWE 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
89.5% Excellent
MC Read 32.2
MC Write 29.5
MC Mixed 30.6
88% 30.8 GB/s
SC Read 27.5
SC Write 44.2
SC Mixed 31.4
98% 34.4 GB/s
Latency 78.7
51% 78.7 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 89.5%
Great: 105%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-A5 K1 Builds (Compare 149 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 71%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 65%
Battle cruiser

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-A5 K1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $82
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback