Today's hottest deals

HP Elite Tower 600 G9 Desktop PC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics6.27% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Elite Tower 600 G9 Desktop PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8950
Memory3.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221214
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateMar 16 '23 at 13:52
Run Duration106 Seconds
Run User ZAF-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-12100-$111
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
74.2% Very good
Memory 52.1
1-Core 173
2-Core 339
95% 188 Pts
4-Core 516
8-Core 798
81% 657 Pts
64-Core 797
49% 797 Pts
Poor: 88%
This bench: 74.2%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 730
HP(103C 8950) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.3959
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
6.27% Terrible
Lighting 6.7
Reflection 12.7
Parallax 7.7
6% 9.03 fps
MRender 11.4
Gravity 8.3
Splatting 9.3
8% 9.67 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.27%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST500LM034-2GH17A 500GB
422GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RPM4
SusWrite @10s intervals: 45 66 22 24 88 114 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
62.4% Good
Read 157
Write 113
Mixed 75.7
SusWrite 59.9
75% 101 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
201% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 62.4%
Great: 89%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M323R1GB4BB0-CQKOL 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM 22h 4800 MHz clocked @ 4400 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
46.5% Average
MC Read 14.5
MC Write 21.1
MC Mixed 15.4
49% 17 GB/s
SC Read 9.2
SC Write 19.6
SC Mixed 10.8
38% 13.2 GB/s
Latency 153
26% 153 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 46.5%
Great: 78%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Elite Tower 600 G9 Desktop PC Builds (Compare 40 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

System: HP Elite Tower 600 G9 Desktop PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $209Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback