Supermicro NONE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 75%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 102%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics99.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive321% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemSupermicro NONE  (all builds)
MotherboardSupermicro X12SPA-TF
Memory121 GB free of 128 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors, 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210621
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateMar 16 '23 at 20:40
Run Duration151 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon Gold 6312U
CPU, 1 CPU, 24 cores, 48 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
69% Good
Memory 77
1-Core 82.6
2-Core 165
63% 108 Pts
4-Core 328
8-Core 655
58% 491 Pts
64-Core 2,891
179% 2,891 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 69%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro RTX 4000
Nvidia(10DE 12A0) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3250 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 461.40
Performing below potential (63rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
99.1% Outstanding
Lighting 117
Reflection 136
Parallax 124
96% 126 fps
MRender 169
Gravity 108
Splatting 118
106% 132 fps
Poor: 92%
This bench: 99.1%
Great: 102%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZ1L2960HCJR-00A07 960GB
820GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GDC7202Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1408 1410 1415 1415 1415 1415 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
321% Outstanding
Read 2,336
Write 1,414
Mixed 1,901
SusWrite 1,413
395% 1,766 MB/s
4K Read 54.2
4K Write 230
4K Mixed 89
318% 124 MB/s
DQ Read 1,071
DQ Write 846
DQ Mixed 955
716% 957 MB/s
Poor: 226%
This bench: 321%
Great: 360%
ST4000NM024B-2TF103 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: SN01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 244 240 245 244 245 244 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
44.1% Average
Read 228
Write 208
Mixed 120
SusWrite 244
45% 200 MB/s
4K Read 38.9
4K Write 24.1
4K Mixed 1.1
73% 21.4 MB/s
DQ Read 4.2
DQ Write 20.4
DQ Mixed 0.5
4% 8.37 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 44.1%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 18ASF2G72PDZ-3G2R1 8x16GB
8 of 16 slots used
128GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
293% Outstanding
MC Read 109
MC Write 150
MC Mixed 115
356% 124 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 27.9
SC Mixed 13.7
54% 19 GB/s
Latency 86.3
46% 86.3 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 293%
Great: 402%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical NONE Builds (Compare 11 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 158%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 217%
UFO

System: Supermicro NONE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 45% - Average Total price: $1,104
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback