Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 28% Raft	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 18%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	5% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	70.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7600U 13,451 User benchmarks, average bench 50% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	18% Very poor	Memory 3.16 1-Core 81.7 2-Core 140 35% 74.9 Pts	4-Core 187 8-Core 194 25% 190 Pts	64-Core 194 12% 194 Pts
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 18% Great: 65%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake) 387,149 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Legend(17AA 224B) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.100.9865 Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	5% Terrible	Lighting 5.7 Reflection 3.3 Parallax 6.2 5% 5.07 fps	MRender 5.2 Gravity 5.8 Splatting 8.9 6% 6.63 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 5% Great: 6%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB 44,403 User benchmarks, average bench 196% 237GB free (System drive) Firmware: 7L7QCXY7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 563 481 622 527 509 520 MB/s Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	70.7% Very good	Read 512 Write 438 Mixed 403 SusWrite 537 106% 472 MB/s	4K Read 10.1 4K Write 11.4 4K Mixed 10.1 34% 10.5 MB/s	DQ Read 139 DQ Write 168 DQ Mixed 129 104% 146 MB/s
Poor: 126% ↑ This bench: 70.7% Great: 259%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 4ATF51264HZ-2G3B2 Hynix HMA82GS6AFR8N-UH 20GB 43 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 2133, 2133 MHz 4096, 16384 MB Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	26.6% Poor	MC Read 11.6 MC Write 10.6 MC Mixed 6.2 27% 9.47 GB/s	SC Read 8.3 SC Write 10.3 SC Mixed 10.7 28% 9.77 GB/s	Latency 473 8% 473 ns
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 26.6% Great: 65%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 53%

Yacht

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core i7-7600UIntelBench 50%, 13,451 samples	4x

GPU
HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 387,149 samples	4x

SSD
SD8SN8U-512G-1006 512GBSandiskBench 75%, 1,494 samples	3x
PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsungBench 196%, 44,403 samples	1x

RAM
M471A5244BB0-CRC M471A2K43CB1-CRC 20GBSamsungBench 49%, 67 samples	3x
4ATF51264HZ-2G3B2 Hynix HMA82GS6AFR8N-UH 20GBMicronBench 46%, 43 samples	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16