Today's hottest deals

HP EliteBook 850 G2

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics4.58% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP EliteBook 850 G2  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 2216
Memory4.1 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150901
Uptime8.1 Days
Run DateNov 27 '17 at 11:46
Run Duration135 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-5200U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
48.9% Average
Memory 67.9
1-Core 67.4
2-Core 121
52% 85.6 Pts
4-Core 177
8-Core 163
23% 170 Pts
64-Core 172
11% 172 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 48.9%
Great: 54%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 5500 (Mobile 0.95 GHz)
HP(103C 2216) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4483
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
4.58% Terrible
Lighting 5.17
Reflection 6.23
Parallax 6.38
4% 5.92 fps
MRender 5.14
Gravity 4.9
Splatting 8.52
5% 6.19 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.58%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST500LM021-1KJ152 500GB
370GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0002YXM1 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
59.3% Above average
Read 103
Write 104
Mixed 91.1
75% 99.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.67
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.14
57% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 59.3%
Great: 77%
ADATA CH11 500GB
169GB free, PID a11a
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
22.5% Poor
Read 51.4
Write 52.3
Mixed 48
65% 50.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.31
4K Write 1.15
4K Mixed 0.25
49% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 22.5%
Great: 40%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5173EB0-YK0 Kingston 9905428-417.A00LF 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
30.1% Below average
MC Read 9.6
MC Write 10.1
MC Mixed 10.4
29% 10 GB/s
SC Read 9
SC Write 11.2
SC Mixed 9.1
28% 9.77 GB/s
Latency 106
38% 106 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 30.1%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EliteBook 850 G2 Builds (Compare 58 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteBook 850 G2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $365
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback