Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	12.3% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

13 months ago, 13 months ago.

PC Performing as expected (45^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-12500H 11,588 User benchmarks, average bench 94% U3E1, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 16 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	88.5% Excellent	Memory 69.2 1-Core 157 2-Core 324 95% 183 Pts	4-Core 578 8-Core 879 90% 729 Pts	64-Core 1,230 76% 1,230 Pts
Poor: 87% ↑ This bench: 88.5% Great: 99%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Legend(17AA 3831) 1GB Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.3251 Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	12.3% Very poor	Lighting 13.1 Reflection 56.8 Parallax 15.1 11% 28.3 fps	MRender 19.2 Gravity 22.8 Splatting 16.2 16% 19.4 fps
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 12.3% Great: 21%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZAL4512HBLU-00BL2 512GB 2,247 User benchmarks, average bench 213% 403GB free (System drive) Firmware: 7L1QHXC7 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 1,893 Write 1,492 Mixed 1,419 356% 1,601 MB/s	4K Read 63.6 4K Write 151 4K Mixed 77.6 276% 97.5 MB/s	DQ Read 1,404 DQ Write 975 DQ Mixed 1,120 855% 1,166 MB/s
Poor: 104% Great: 320%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M425R1GB4BB0-CQKOD Micron MTC4C10163S1SC48BA1 16GB 1,234 User benchmarks, average bench 111% 4800, 4800 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	121% Outstanding	MC Read 50.6 MC Write 44.1 MC Mixed 44.1 132% 46.3 GB/s	SC Read 19.5 SC Write 40 SC Mixed 27.1 82% 28.9 GB/s	Latency 103 39% 103 ns
Poor: 94% ↑ This bench: 121% Great: 121%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 27%

Raft

Desktop 101%

UFO

Workstation 28%

Raft

CPU
Core i7-12700HIntelBench 97%, 52,857 samples	1,140x
Core i5-12500HIntelBench 94%, 11,588 samples	259x

GPU
Iris Xe GraphicsIntelBench 16%, 72,765 samples	557x
RTX 3060 (Laptop)NvidiaBench 90%, 102,706 samples	497x
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPUNvidiaBench 123%, 4,475 samples	171x

SSD
MZVL21T0HCLR-00BL2 1TBSamsungBench 363%, 10,270 samples	388x
MTFDKBA1T0TFH 1TBMicronBench 368%, 2,857 samples	216x
MZAL4512HBLU-00BL2 512GBSamsungBench 213%, 2,247 samples	195x

RAM
M425R1GB4BB0-CQKOL 2x8GBSamsungBench 120%, 26,893 samples	554x
MTC4C10163S1SC48BA1 2x8GBMicronBench 120%, 12,360 samples	308x
HMCG66MEBSA092N 2x8GBHynixBench 121%, 4,275 samples	110x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16