HP ProLiant ML350p Gen8

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics5.92% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive56.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory256GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 256GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemHP ProLiant ML350p Gen8  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory249.7 GB free of 256 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190524
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 18 '23 at 23:37
Run Duration265 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2667 v2
Proc 1, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
74.1% Very good
Memory 78.4
1-Core 94
2-Core 188
69% 120 Pts
4-Core 375
8-Core 751
66% 563 Pts
64-Core 1,896
117% 1,896 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 74.1%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro 2000
Nvidia(10DE 084A) 1GB
CLim: 625 MHz, MLim: 652 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 377.83
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
5.92% Terrible
Lighting 6.9
Reflection 9.2
Parallax 6.6
6% 7.57 fps
MRender 9.5
Gravity 7.9
Splatting 6.9
6% 8.1 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 5.92%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata Ultimate SU800 1TB-$95
767GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0427ANR
SusWrite @10s intervals: 201 202 202 203 203 203 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
56.3% Above average
Read 216
Write 204
Mixed 197
SusWrite 202
46% 205 MB/s
4K Read 26.8
4K Write 43.7
4K Mixed 32
105% 34.2 MB/s
DQ Read 34.3
DQ Write 80.7
DQ Mixed 49.2
40% 54.7 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 56.3%
Great: 126%
WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB-$150
1.5TB free
Firmware: 620311WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2226 2237 2238 2230 2241 2229 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
328% Outstanding
Read 2,437
Write 2,302
Mixed 2,154
SusWrite 2,234
514% 2,282 MB/s
4K Read 54.3
4K Write 95.9
4K Mixed 64.3
215% 71.5 MB/s
DQ Read 674
DQ Write 530
DQ Mixed 583
442% 596 MB/s
Poor: 293%
This bench: 328%
Great: 666%
Samsung MZVLB256HAHQ-000H1 256GB
91GB free
Firmware: EXD70H1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1218 291 293 293 292 293 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
190% Outstanding
Read 2,156
Write 1544
Mixed 1,274
SusWrite 447
301% 1,355 MB/s
4K Read 43.6
4K Write 80.6
4K Mixed 54.8
179% 59.7 MB/s
DQ Read 590
DQ Write 340
DQ Mixed 516
370% 482 MB/s
Poor: 106%
This bench: 190%
Great: 235%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$60
22GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 58 58 57 57 58 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
33.5% Below average
Read 59.2
Write 52.8
Mixed 45
SusWrite 57.5
40% 53.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.5
103% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 33.5%
Great: 67%
HP LOGICAL VOLUME 2TB
196GB free
Firmware: 8.00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 49 49 48 49 49 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 14% Great: 98%
HP LOGICAL VOLUME 10TB
6TB free
Firmware: 8.00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 51 51 51 49 51 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 8TB
2TB free, PID ab38
SusWrite @10s intervals: 154 152 151 157 154 160 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
62.4% Good
Read 89.1
Write 103
Mixed 62.5
SusWrite 155
144% 102 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 5
4K Mixed 0.6
196% 2.37 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 62.4%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HP 712384-081 712384-081 712384-081 712384-081 712384-081 712384-081 NOT AVAILABLE 712384-081 255GB
1866, 1866, 1866, 1866, 1866, 1866, 1866, 1866 MHz
32767, 32767, 32767, 32767, 32767, 32767, 32767, 32767 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
93.2% Outstanding
MC Read 47.8
MC Write 31.1
MC Mixed 34.9
108% 37.9 GB/s
SC Read 14.7
SC Write 5.9
SC Mixed 6.1
25% 8.9 GB/s
Latency 83.5
48% 83.5 ns
Poor: 88%
This bench: 93.2%
Great: 93%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ProLiant ML350p Gen8 Builds (Compare 42 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk

System: HP ProLiant ML350p Gen8

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 223% - Outstanding Total price: $150
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback