HP EliteDesk 800 G3 SFF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics5.27% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP EliteDesk 800 G3 SFF  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8299
Memory27.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221215
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 21 '23 at 12:51
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User AUT-User
Background CPU 30%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-6100-$48
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
46.1% Average
Memory 52.5
1-Core 95.3
2-Core 131
54% 93 Pts
4-Core 227
8-Core 242
31% 235 Pts
64-Core 269
17% 269 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 46.1%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)
HP(103C 8299) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2111
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
5.27% Terrible
Lighting 5.8
Reflection 5.5
Parallax 6.3
5% 5.87 fps
MRender 7.8
Gravity 5.3
Splatting 9.4
6% 7.5 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.27%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Fanxiang S500PRO 256GB
194GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SN09273
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 946
Write 632
Mixed 773
174% 784 MB/s
4K Read 18.9
4K Write 13.2
4K Mixed 18.6
60% 16.9 MB/s
DQ Read 162
DQ Write 163
DQ Mixed 139
111% 155 MB/s
Poor: 99% Great: 273%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A1K43CB2-CRC M378A1K43CB2-CTD M378A1K43CB2-CTD M378A1K43CB2-CTD 32GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
39.4% Below average
MC Read 11.7
MC Write 17.4
MC Mixed 13.2
40% 14.1 GB/s
SC Read 8.4
SC Write 16.2
SC Mixed 11.2
34% 11.9 GB/s
Latency 152
26% 152 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 39.4%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EliteDesk 800 G3 SFF Builds (Compare 1,794 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteDesk 800 G3 SFF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $60
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $383
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback