Asus TUF B360-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (4th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 96 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 20.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics42.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive55.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus TUF B360-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200619
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 24 '23 at 13:23
Run Duration123 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-9100F-$115
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Relative performance (0th percentile)
20.4% Poor
Memory 14.9
1-Core 109
2-Core 109
42% 77.5 Pts
4-Core 139
8-Core 211
22% 175 Pts
64-Core 308
19% 308 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 20.4%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$267
Asus(1043 869D) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 531.29
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
42.8% Average
Lighting 52
Reflection 64.4
Parallax 58.8
42% 58.4 fps
MRender 70.7
Gravity 45.4
Splatting 47.3
44% 54.5 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 42.8%
Great: 97%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intenso NVME 500GB
124GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V0210A0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 200 247 201 312 236 311 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
55.7% Above average
Read 457
Write 383
Mixed 366
SusWrite 251
82% 364 MB/s
4K Read 10.1
4K Write 21.6
4K Mixed 4.5
32% 12.1 MB/s
DQ Read 315
DQ Write 265
DQ Mixed 233
190% 271 MB/s
Poor: 117%
This bench: 55.7%
Great: 249%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Apacer GD2.1827CS.007 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
24.7% Poor
MC Read 9.3
MC Write 11
MC Mixed 8.3
27% 9.53 GB/s
SC Read 4.8
SC Write 6.3
SC Mixed 4
14% 5.03 GB/s
Latency 361
11% 361 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 24.7%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF B360-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 2,064 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 79%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 66%
Battle cruiser

Motherboard: Asus TUF B360-PLUS GAMING - $105

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 85% - Excellent Total price: $557
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback