Dynabook Satellite Pro A50-F

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.96% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive37.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (63%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemDynabook Satellite Pro A50-F  (all builds)
MotherboardDynabook A0105/0000
Memory2.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20201204
Uptime8.7 Days
Run DateMar 25 '23 at 10:37
Run Duration119 Seconds
Run User PSE-User
Background CPU 63%

 PC Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-8145U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
42.7% Average
Memory 56.7
1-Core 52.2
2-Core 107
43% 72 Pts
4-Core 167
8-Core 168
22% 168 Pts
64-Core 165
10% 165 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 42.7%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620
Device(3100 000D) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.100.9864
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
3.96% Terrible
Lighting 4.7
Reflection 2.8
Parallax 4.2
4% 3.9 fps
MRender 4
Gravity 4.4
Splatting 6.4
4% 4.93 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.96%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 256GB
170GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 125 121 105 80 52 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
37.9% Below average
Read 318
Write 160
Mixed 243
SusWrite 100
46% 205 MB/s
4K Read 8.3
4K Write 17.4
4K Mixed 8
32% 11.2 MB/s
DQ Read 223
DQ Write 202
DQ Mixed 191
149% 205 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 37.9%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CTD 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
28.4% Poor
MC Read 11.5
MC Write 9
MC Mixed 8.7
28% 9.73 GB/s
SC Read 8.4
SC Write 9.6
SC Mixed 8.8
26% 8.93 GB/s
Latency 138
29% 138 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 28.4%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Satellite Pro A50-F Builds (Compare 22 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Dynabook Satellite Pro A50-F

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback