Northern_micro P9X79--IN

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 51%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 45%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics57.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive66.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemNorthern_micro P9X79--IN  (all builds)
MotherboardIntel DX79TO
Memory28.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140307
Uptime13.1 Days
Run DateNov 28 '17 at 21:38
Run Duration108 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3930K-$280
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
78.2% Very good
Memory 88.7
1-Core 92.5
2-Core 185
72% 122 Pts
4-Core 366
8-Core 559
57% 462 Pts
64-Core 703
44% 703 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 78.2%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1531 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
57.1% Above average
Lighting 72
Reflection 72.7
Parallax 64.3
59% 69.7 fps
MRender 75.5
Gravity 67
Splatting 58.3
54% 67 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 57.1%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS1311 240GB-$78
164GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS131122 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
66.8% Good
Read 504
Write 339
Mixed 361
89% 401 MB/s
4K Read 20.3
4K Write 31.7
4K Mixed 10.2
60% 20.7 MB/s
DQ Read 234
DQ Write 144
DQ Mixed 48.3
74% 142 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 66.8%
Great: 97%
Seagate Desktop SSHD 1TB-$68
763GB free
Firmware: CC41 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
81.2% Excellent
Read 111
Write 171
Mixed 115
99% 132 MB/s
4K Read 0.79
4K Write 5.32
4K Mixed 0.75
215% 2.29 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 81.2%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 0x46332D3231333343392D38475A48 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
91.4% Outstanding
MC Read 37.1
MC Write 37
MC Mixed 33.5
102% 35.9 GB/s
SC Read 15.3
SC Write 12.7
SC Mixed 11.9
38% 13.3 GB/s
Latency 68.8
58% 68.8 ns
Poor: 91%
This bench: 91.4%
Great: 119%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P9X79--IN Builds (Compare 28 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

System: Northern_micro P9X79--IN

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Very good Total price: $178
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback