Performance Results


Gaming 15% Surfboard	Desktop 72% Battleship	Workstation 13% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	17.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	68.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 870-$100 37,228 User benchmarks, average bench 66% CPU, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	67.3% Good	Memory 89.1 1-Core 82.8 2-Core 156 66% 109 Pts	4-Core 248 8-Core 354 38% 301 Pts	64-Core 359 22% 359 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 67.3% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92 309,423 User benchmarks, average bench 17% Zotac(19DA 288A) 2GB CLim: 1306 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 531.29 Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	17.3% Very poor	Lighting 21.3 Reflection 18.1 Parallax 20.6 17% 20 fps	MRender 24.8 Gravity 23.2 Splatting 16.7 17% 21.6 fps
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 17.3% Great: 19%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 870 EVO 500GB-$68 60,851 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 426GB free (System drive) Firmware: SVT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 181 214 218 225 220 219 MB/s Performing below potential (4^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	68.1% Good	Read 243 Write 231 Mixed 214 SusWrite 213 51% 225 MB/s	4K Read 24.6 4K Write 55 4K Mixed 38.5 116% 39.4 MB/s	DQ Read 200 DQ Write 191 DQ Mixed 197 147% 196 MB/s
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 68.1% Great: 130%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown HMT451U6BFR8A-PB 80AD HMT451U6AFR8C-PB 80AD HMT451U6AFR8C-PB 80AD HMT451U6BFR8A-PB 16GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	40.4% Average	MC Read 15.7 MC Write 12.7 MC Mixed 12.6 39% 13.7 GB/s	SC Read 11.3 SC Write 9.7 SC Mixed 11.9 31% 11 GB/s	Latency 68.4 58% 68.4 ns
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 40.4% Great: 40%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 47%

Yacht

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD Graphics (Clarkdale 0.733/0.9 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 20,588 samples	8x
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	7x
GeForce GT 420NvidiaBench 2%, 9,903 samples	5x

RAM
HMT451U6BFR8A-PB 80AD HMT451U6AFR8C-PB 80AD HMT451U6AFR8C-PB 80AD HMT451U6BFR8A-PB 16GBUnknownBench 40%, 3 samples	3x
HMT125U6TFR8C-H9 80CE M378B5673FH0-CH9 80AD HMT125U6TFR8C-H9 80CE M378B5673FH0-CH9 8GBUnknownBench 34%, 6 samples	3x
HP698650-154-KEB 4x4GBUnknownBench 45%, 7 samples	3x

Value: 49% - Average

Total price: $138