Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 34% Sail boat	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 26.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	5.99% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	54.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16.1GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 16.1GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

13 months ago, 13 months ago.

PC Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A10-9700 APU (2016 M.BR) 11,837 User benchmarks, average bench 42% P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	26.3% Poor	Memory 27.3 1-Core 64.8 2-Core 116 37% 69.4 Pts	4-Core 140 8-Core 179 20% 160 Pts	64-Core 161 10% 161 Pts
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 26.3% Great: 52%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 Graphics 37,078 User benchmarks, average bench 6% HP(103C 822A) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	5.99% Terrible	Lighting 7.5 Reflection 7.5 Parallax 11.3 6% 8.77 fps	MRender 4 Gravity 9.2 Splatting 7.5 6% 6.9 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 5.99% Great: 8%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Blue SA510 2.5 1000GB 3,795 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 582GB free (System drive) Firmware: 52020100 SusWrite @10s intervals: 259 227 308 262 197 206 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	54.1% Above average	Read 302 Write 202 Mixed 274 SusWrite 243 57% 255 MB/s	4K Read 14.5 4K Write 33.1 4K Mixed 20.2 65% 22.6 MB/s	DQ Read 238 DQ Write 61.7 DQ Mixed 112 92% 137 MB/s
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 54.1% Great: 112%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CMK32GX4M2Z3600C18 16GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 21% 2400, 2400 MHz 16384, 64 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	20.9% Poor	MC Read 8.8 MC Write 7.8 MC Mixed 8 23% 8.2 GB/s	SC Read 2.7 SC Write 3.1 SC Mixed 2.5 8% 2.77 GB/s	Latency 271 15% 271 ns
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 20.9% Great: 22%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 45%

Yacht

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

CPU
A10-9700 APU (2016 M.BR)AMDBench 42%, 11,837 samples	7x

GPU
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 6%, 37,078 samples	6x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	1x

RAM
M378A1K43BB1-CPB 1x8GBSamsungBench 37%, 7,085 samples	2x
CMK32GX4M2Z3600C18 16GBCorsairBench 21%, 2 samples	2x
F4-2133C15-16GIS Samsung M378A1K43BB1-CPB 24GBUnknownBench 55%, 2 samples	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16