HP Z2 Tower G5 Workstation

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics37.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemHP Z2 Tower G5 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8750
Memory58.3 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221128
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMar 28 '23 at 12:33
Run Duration169 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-10900-$281
CPU0, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
93.9% Outstanding
Memory 86.2
1-Core 147
2-Core 289
95% 174 Pts
4-Core 544
8-Core 1,080
96% 812 Pts
64-Core 1,837
114% 1,837 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 93.9%
Great: 102%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6400
Sapphire(1DA2 E458) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 4GB, Driver: 22.5.2
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
37.7% Below average
Lighting 43.3
Reflection 62.1
Parallax 80.4
35% 61.9 fps
MRender 95.5
Gravity 45.7
Splatting 27.1
42% 56.1 fps
Poor: 34%
This bench: 37.7%
Great: 39%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue SN570 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB
725GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 234100WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,965
Write 2,084
Mixed 1,810
437% 1,953 MB/s
4K Read 43.9
4K Write 87
4K Mixed 56.2
185% 62.4 MB/s
DQ Read 944
DQ Write 570
DQ Mixed 726
549% 747 MB/s
Poor: 159% Great: 300%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35
341GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 126
Write 103
Mixed 71.4
74% 100 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1.2
228% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 52% Great: 109%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$110
3TB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 184
Write 171
Mixed 114
116% 156 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1.1
218% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 46% Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9965745-039.A00G 2x31.5GB
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
88.7% Excellent
MC Read 31.9
MC Write 36.6
MC Mixed 27.5
91% 32 GB/s
SC Read 16.2
SC Write 37.3
SC Mixed 24.8
75% 26.1 GB/s
Latency 71.1
56% 71.1 ns
Poor: 89%
This bench: 88.7%
Great: 157%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z2 Tower G5 Workstation Builds (Compare 740 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard

System: HP Z2 Tower G5 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 93% - Outstanding Total price: $272
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $153
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback