Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (7th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 93 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive	31.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 0 2,388 User benchmarks, average bench 68% CPU1, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	54.7% Above average	Memory 51 1-Core 28.2 2-Core 138 39% 72.3 Pts	4-Core 313 8-Core 619 55% 466 Pts	64-Core 1,592 98% 1,592 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 54.7% Great: 74%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
PNY CS900 120GB-$20 42,924 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 70GB free (System drive) Firmware: CS900612 SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 132 50 47 47 50 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	31.7% Below average	Read 199 Write 135 Mixed 133 SusWrite 77.4 30% 136 MB/s	4K Read 12.6 4K Write 16.7 4K Mixed 12.3 44% 13.9 MB/s	DQ Read 148 DQ Write 101 DQ Mixed 103 83% 117 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 31.7% Great: 87%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 36JSZF1G72PZ-1G4D1 4x8GB 11 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 4 of 24 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	21.3% Poor	MC Read 7.1 MC Write 8.7 MC Mixed 7.8 22% 7.87 GB/s	SC Read 4.8 SC Write 2.4 SC Mixed 3.3 10% 3.5 GB/s	Latency 157 26% 157 ns
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 21.3% Great: 43%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 43%

Speed boat

Desktop 80%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 49%

Yacht

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2667 v21stBench 74%, 880 samples	11x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2697 v21stBench 64%, 772 samples	6x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2650 v21stBench 64%, 1,386 samples	5x

GPU
Quadro M5000NvidiaBench 50%, 1,540 samples	6x
Quadro M4000NvidiaBench 32%, 9,043 samples	5x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	4x

SSD
950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsung $330Bench 223%, 54,978 samples	11x
960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsung $139Bench 266%, 63,520 samples	5x
SSD 1TBPcieBench 292%, 19,971 samples	2x

RAM
HMT84GL7BMR4C-RD 002C04B3002C 72JSZS4G72L1G9E2A7 00AD04B300AD HMT84GL7AMR4C-RD 00AD063200AD HMT84GL7AMR4C-RD 002C04B3002C 72JSZS4G72L1G9E2A7 00AD04B300AD HMT84GL7AMR4C-RD 191GBUnknownBench 75%, 9 samples	6x
HMT84GL7AMR4A-PB 8x31.9GBHynixBench 43%, 5 samples	4x
HMT84GL7AMR4C-RD 4x31.8GBHynixBench 71%, 22 samples	3x

Value: 20% - Poor

Total price: $330