Today's hottest deals

Biostar TZ68A+

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics8.06% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive74% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
19 months ago, 19 months ago.
MotherboardBiostar TZ68A+  (all builds)
Memory8.8 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120709
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 31 '23 at 14:56
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 18%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3350P-$60
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
62.3% Good
Memory 81.4
1-Core 80.9
2-Core 160
64% 107 Pts
4-Core 250
8-Core 262
34% 256 Pts
64-Core 276
17% 276 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 62.3%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 650-$112
Zotac(19DA 2263) 2GB
CLim: 1071 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
8.06% Terrible
Lighting 8.9
Reflection 11.5
Parallax 11.6
7% 10.7 fps
MRender 13.4
Gravity 11.8
Splatting 10.6
10% 11.9 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 8.06%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue SA510 2.5 1TB
900GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 52008100
SusWrite @10s intervals: 337 351 353 381 394 390 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
74% Very good
Read 314
Write 398
Mixed 330
SusWrite 368
80% 352 MB/s
4K Read 27.2
4K Write 56.3
4K Mixed 34.7
116% 39.4 MB/s
DQ Read 33.3
DQ Write 97
DQ Mixed 47.5
41% 59.3 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 74%
Great: 112%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$68
2TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 127 127 127 129 128 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
75.2% Very good
Read 135
Write 123
Mixed 79.8
SusWrite 127
85% 116 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
197% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 75.2%
Great: 84%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 991782 (996782) 991782 (996782) 991995 (996995) 991995 (996995) 12GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
28.5% Poor
MC Read 9.2
MC Write 9.6
MC Mixed 8.4
26% 9.07 GB/s
SC Read 8.8
SC Write 9.6
SC Mixed 8.5
26% 8.97 GB/s
Latency 78
51% 78 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 28.5%
Great: 37%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TZ68A+ Builds (Compare 55 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Biostar TZ68A+

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $345
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $209Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback