Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (3rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 97 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive	33.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (57%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Theis-computer THEIS-Extra PC Typ 10 H61DT-R3 (all builds)
Motherboard	Gigabyte H61M-S1
Memory	5.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130417
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 31 '23 at 22:46
Run Duration	119 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	57%

PC Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E3-1220 V2-$305 3,748 User benchmarks, average bench 69% Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E3-1220 V2 @ 3.10GHz, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	50.8% Above average	Memory 82.9 1-Core 77.8 2-Core 106 57% 89 Pts	4-Core 112 8-Core 112 15% 112 Pts	64-Core 105 6% 105 Pts
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 50.8% Great: 77%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston RBU-SC400S37128G 128GB 864 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 14GB free (System drive) Firmware: 505ABBF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 126 101 132 117 129 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	33.6% Below average	Read 125 Write 122 Mixed 128 SusWrite 122 28% 124 MB/s	4K Read 13.8 4K Write 30 4K Mixed 17.3 59% 20.4 MB/s	DQ Read 31.3 DQ Write 93.7 DQ Mixed 40.5 37% 55.2 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 33.6% Great: 82%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Transcend TS512MLK64V3H 830B M2F4G64CB8HG5N-CG 8GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	46.2% Average	MC Read 16.5 MC Write 15.4 MC Mixed 15.4 45% 15.8 GB/s	SC Read 13.8 SC Write 14.1 SC Mixed 14.1 40% 14 GB/s	Latency 75.4 53% 75.4 ns
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 46.2% Great: 48%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 9%

Tree trunk

Desktop 62%

Destroyer

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

SSD
RBU-SC400S37128G 128GBKingstonBench 70%, 864 samples	1x
PLUS 240GBSandiskBench 45%, 86,316 samples	1x
SSD Plus 240GBSanDisk $30Bench 61%, 133,640 samples	1x

RAM
PSD34G160081 2x4GBPatriotBench 48%, 2,742 samples	1x
F641GU67F9333G 2x8GBUnknownBench 47%, 142 samples	1x
TS512MLK64V3H 830B M2F4G64CB8HG5N-CG 8GBTranscendBench 47%, 3 samples	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16