Apple MacPro6,1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (10th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 90 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 62%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics20.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive157% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemApple MacPro6,1  (all builds)
MotherboardApple Mac-F60DEB81FF30ACF6
Memory60.2 GB free of 63.998 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220823
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 02 '23 at 19:58
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2
, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
62% Good
Memory 65.7
1-Core 77.1
2-Core 154
57% 99.1 Pts
4-Core 312
8-Core 628
55% 470 Pts
64-Core 1,185
73% 1,185 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 62%
Great: 75%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD FirePro D300 (FireGL V)
Apple(106B 012B) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1060.0
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
20.4% Poor
Lighting 25.7
Reflection 30
Parallax 35.9
21% 30.5 fps
MRender 25.1
Gravity 26.4
Splatting 20.8
19% 24.1 fps
Poor: 20%
This bench: 20.4%
Great: 24%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Aura Pro X2 2TB
446GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 42A7T1UA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 909 924 929 933 816 516 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
157% Outstanding
Read 1,128
Write 990
Mixed 890
SusWrite 838
216% 961 MB/s
4K Read 37.5
4K Write 57.6
4K Mixed 44.1
144% 46.4 MB/s
DQ Read 429
DQ Write 290
DQ Mixed 384
280% 368 MB/s
Poor: 157%
This bench: 157%
Great: 375%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 0x4D3339334234473730444D302D5948392020 2x31.5GB
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM DDR3 1066 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
24.7% Poor
MC Read 14.1
MC Write 6.7
MC Mixed 5.8
25% 8.87 GB/s
SC Read 1.2
SC Write 8.2
SC Mixed 3.7
12% 4.37 GB/s
Latency 112
36% 112 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MacPro6,1 Builds (Compare 57 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

System: Apple MacPro6,1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 61% - Good Total price: $635
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback