Today's hottest deals

Default string

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics30.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive43.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
17 months ago, 17 months ago.
SystemDefault string  (all builds)
MotherboardMACHINIST E5-MR9A PRO
Memory9.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20221206
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 04 '23 at 15:22
Run Duration135 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing below expectations (21st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
67.5% Good
Memory 72.2
1-Core 84.5
2-Core 168
62% 108 Pts
4-Core 337
8-Core 662
59% 500 Pts
64-Core 1,104
68% 1,104 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 67.5%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
Nvidia(10DE 116F) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1405 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 531.41
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
30.4% Below average
Lighting 40.2
Reflection 42.1
Parallax 37.1
33% 39.8 fps
MRender 24.4
Gravity 36.9
Splatting 32.4
26% 31.2 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 30.4%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Xraydisk 240GB 240GB
105GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1219
SusWrite @10s intervals: 205 19 15 27 91 6.9 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
43.2% Average
Read 399
Write 192
Mixed 263
SusWrite 60.7
51% 229 MB/s
4K Read 17.4
4K Write 23.1
4K Mixed 9.6
51% 16.7 MB/s
DQ Read 174
DQ Write 213
DQ Mixed 19.1
63% 135 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 43.2%
Great: 93%
Kingston A400 240GB-$25
83GB free
Firmware: 0103
SusWrite @10s intervals: 316 226 42 43 42 43 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
46.4% Average
Read 391
Write 282
Mixed 284
SusWrite 119
60% 269 MB/s
4K Read 15.4
4K Write 21.4
4K Mixed 16.6
56% 17.8 MB/s
DQ Read 144
DQ Write 134
DQ Mixed 116
93% 131 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 46.4%
Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown JHD3200U1808JG 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
54.6% Above average
MC Read 23.6
MC Write 18.7
MC Mixed 17.2
57% 19.8 GB/s
SC Read 11.7
SC Write 16
SC Mixed 15
41% 14.2 GB/s
Latency 96.4
42% 96.4 ns
Poor: 55%
This bench: 54.6%
Great: 95%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical string Builds (Compare 15,189 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: Default string

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 90% - Excellent Total price: $84
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $144
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $70
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback