Today's hottest deals

Asus H110M-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics29.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive74.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (54%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus H110M-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory4.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20170316
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 30 '17 at 14:46
Run Duration120 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 54%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7600K-$135
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
89.4% Excellent
Memory 90.9
1-Core 127
2-Core 255
88% 158 Pts
4-Core 507
8-Core 508
68% 508 Pts
64-Core 516
32% 516 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 89.4%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 270X-$199
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 13.200.0.0
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
29.4% Poor
Lighting 36.2
Reflection 34.6
Parallax 45.3
30% 38.7 fps
MRender 30.7
Gravity 33.8
Splatting 40.5
29% 35 fps
Poor: 25%
This bench: 29.4%
Great: 29%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS1311 240GB-$78
192GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS13 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
74.5% Very good
Read 495
Write 301
Mixed 291
80% 362 MB/s
4K Read 29.4
4K Write 76.5
4K Mixed 9.41
97% 38.4 MB/s
DQ Read 257
DQ Write 151
DQ Mixed 46
77% 151 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 74.5%
Great: 97%
WD WD3200AVVS-63L2B 320GB
76GB free
Firmware: 01.0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
28.4% Poor
Read 50.1
Write 48.5
Mixed 51.8
38% 50.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.32
4K Write 1.68
4K Mixed 0.27
75% 0.76 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 28.4%
Great: 41%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX 2133 C14 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
40.4% Average
MC Read 14.6
MC Write 14.3
MC Mixed 11.4
38% 13.4 GB/s
SC Read 10.9
SC Write 13.4
SC Mixed 10.7
33% 11.7 GB/s
Latency 66
61% 66 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 40.4%
Great: 42%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H110M-PLUS Builds (Compare 661 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 47%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asus H110M-PLUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $292
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $147
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback