Asus ASUS TUF Gaming F15 FX506LI_FX506LI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.57% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive124% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAsus ASUS TUF Gaming F15 FX506LI_FX506LI  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FX506LI
Memory10.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211126
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 11 '23 at 08:38
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10300H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
66.4% Good
Memory 86.2
1-Core 81.2
2-Core 147
64% 105 Pts
4-Core 256
8-Core 350
38% 303 Pts
64-Core 370
23% 370 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 66.4%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Asus(1043 1E91) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7985
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
3.57% Terrible
Lighting 4.4
Reflection 72.5
Parallax 5
4% 27.3 fps
MRender 7.7
Gravity 3.3
Splatting 2.8
4% 4.6 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 3.57%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SNVSE1000G 1TB
192GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EDFK5N0B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 344 51 60 128 197 191 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
124% Outstanding
Read 882
Write 1560
Mixed 1,014
SusWrite 162
204% 904 MB/s
4K Read 36.6
4K Write 110
4K Mixed 50.8
179% 65.7 MB/s
DQ Read 620
DQ Write 429
DQ Mixed 561
409% 537 MB/s
Poor: 124%
This bench: 124%
Great: 280%
WD WD10SPZX-00HKTT0 1TB
353GB free
Firmware: 04.01A04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 79 76 75 77 77 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
42.7% Average
Read 69.5
Write 71.1
Mixed 42.3
SusWrite 77.9
48% 65.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 4.4
4K Mixed 0.2
137% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 42.7%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CWE Hynix HMA81GS6CJR8N-XN 16GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
76.3% Very good
MC Read 28.7
MC Write 30.6
MC Mixed 22.5
78% 27.3 GB/s
SC Read 15
SC Write 30
SC Mixed 22.3
64% 22.4 GB/s
Latency 71.1
56% 71.1 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 76.3%
Great: 96%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ASUS TUF Gaming F15 FX506LI_FX506LI Builds (Compare 2,812 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Asus ASUS TUF Gaming F15 FX506LI_FX506LI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback