Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 60%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 109%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 69%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 107%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics48.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive419% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory21.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220427
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 12 '23 at 03:49
Run Duration297 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 21%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X-$350
AM4, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Memory 85.3
1-Core 174
2-Core 349
108% 203 Pts
4-Core 688
8-Core 1,332
120% 1,010 Pts
64-Core 2,546
158% 2,546 Pts
Poor: 90%
This bench: 107%
Great: 110%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1366 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 23.3.1
Performing below potential (26th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
48.9% Average
Lighting 60.5
Reflection 64.2
Parallax 83.3
49% 69.3 fps
MRender 64.7
Gravity 69.6
Splatting 46.9
48% 60.4 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 48.9%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SKC3000D2048G 2TB
935GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EIFK31.6
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3635 3229 2925 2052 2207 2878 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
419% Outstanding
Read 2,550
Write 3,920
Mixed 3,040
SusWrite 2,821
699% 3,083 MB/s
4K Read 67
4K Write 172
4K Mixed 94.4
314% 111 MB/s
DQ Read 1,168
DQ Write 945
DQ Mixed 1,089
806% 1,067 MB/s
Poor: 278%
This bench: 419%
Great: 614%
XPG GAMMIX S11 Pro 1TB
571GB free
Firmware: 42A4SANA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2162 2159 2147 2176 2186 2027 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
358% Outstanding
Read 2,519
Write 2,167
Mixed 226
SusWrite 2,143
394% 1,764 MB/s
4K Read 55
4K Write 137
4K Mixed 75.6
253% 89.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1,184
DQ Write 972
DQ Mixed 573
567% 910 MB/s
Poor: 185%
This bench: 358%
Great: 373%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
592GB free
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 445 445 443 444 445 443 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 494
Write 439
Mixed 435
SusWrite 444
102% 453 MB/s
4K Read 36.9
4K Write 63.2
4K Mixed 49.2
152% 49.8 MB/s
DQ Read 229
DQ Write 188
DQ Mixed 205
154% 208 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 104%
Great: 133%
Hitachi HUS724030ALA640 3TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: MF8OAA70
SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 137 137 136 138 138 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
79.3% Very good
Read 139
Write 126
Mixed 73.5
SusWrite 137
87% 119 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
165% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 79.3%
Great: 94%
Hitachi HUS724030ALA640 3TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: MF8OAA70
SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 134 133 133 135 132 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
77% Very good
Read 135
Write 131
Mixed 72.3
SusWrite 133
86% 118 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.8
167% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 77%
Great: 94%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata DDR4 3200 Z DDR4 3200 DDR4 3200 DDR4 3200 32GB
3200, 3200, 3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
108% Outstanding
MC Read 46
MC Write 37.2
MC Mixed 36.9
114% 40 GB/s
SC Read 28.4
SC Write 23.8
SC Mixed 36.4
84% 29.5 GB/s
Latency 71.7
56% 71.7 ns
Poor: 74%
This bench: 108%
Great: 108%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 26,629 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $99

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 92% - Outstanding Total price: $851
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $376WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $250Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback