Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (6th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 94 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	1.58% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

19 months ago, 19 months ago.

PC Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-8145UE 17 User benchmarks, average bench 55% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	41.5% Average	Memory 67 1-Core 60.4 2-Core 96 47% 74.5 Pts	4-Core 94.9 8-Core 101 13% 98.1 Pts	64-Core 101 6% 101 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 41.5% Great: 65%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620 178,291 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Intel(8086 2212) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8783 Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	1.58% Terrible	Lighting 1.7 Reflection 2.1 Parallax 1.9 1% 1.9 fps	MRender 2.7 Gravity 1.7 Splatting 2.7 2% 2.37 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 1.58% Great: 6%

Drives	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Udinfo M2S-80UB040GB-W2PB1-26 40GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 15GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFYH1.3 Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	Read 294 Write 259 Mixed 247 59% 266 MB/s	4K Read 16.3 4K Write 36.2 4K Mixed 7.8 54% 20.1 MB/s	DQ Read 200 DQ Write 195 DQ Mixed 122 112% 172 MB/s
Poor: 49% Great: 63%
USB SanDisk 3.2Gen1 32GB 3,459 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 21GB free, PID null Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 131 Write 51.2 Mixed 50.5 83% 77.6 MB/s	4K Read 4.5 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 1.9 98% 2.3 MB/s
Poor: 15% Great: 48%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378A5244CB0-CTD 2x2GB 2 of 2 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	29.3% Poor	MC Read 8.4 MC Write 11.4 MC Mixed 10 28% 9.93 GB/s	SC Read 6.5 SC Write 10.7 SC Mixed 9 25% 8.73 GB/s	Latency 109 37% 109 ns

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM