Today's hottest deals

Tactus Custom PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 344%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 122%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 446%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 123%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics291% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive458% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemTactus Custom PC  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK PRIME X670E-PRO WIFI
Memory24.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220922
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 13 '23 at 16:02
Run Duration220 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X-$467
AM5, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 4.5 GHz, turbo 5.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
123% Outstanding
Memory 86.6
1-Core 222
2-Core 429
128% 246 Pts
4-Core 851
8-Core 1,653
148% 1,252 Pts
64-Core 3,828
237% 3,828 Pts
Poor: 106%
This bench: 123%
Great: 125%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4080-$993
Palit(1569 F296) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 5600 MHz, Ram: 16GB, Driver: 527.56
Performing below potential (49th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
291% Outstanding
Lighting 437
Reflection 428
Parallax 477
356% 447 fps
MRender 539
Gravity 365
Splatting 263
304% 389 fps
Poor: 263%
This bench: 291%
Great: 305%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$117
701GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3047 3102 2964 2586 1618 1615 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
458% Outstanding
Read 2,990
Write 3,001
Mixed 3,118
SusWrite 2,489
654% 2,899 MB/s
4K Read 72.8
4K Write 222
4K Mixed 109
367% 134 MB/s
DQ Read 1,723
DQ Write 1,520
DQ Mixed 1,643
1,226% 1,628 MB/s
Poor: 266%
This bench: 458%
Great: 477%
Samsung 870 QVO 1TB-$105
542GB free
Firmware: SVQ02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 478 492 493 491 490 493 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
128% Outstanding
Read 514
Write 476
Mixed 441
SusWrite 489
108% 480 MB/s
4K Read 39.1
4K Write 115
4K Mixed 58
195% 70.8 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 358
DQ Mixed 368
277% 370 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 128%
Great: 128%
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$117
791GB free
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 667 692 693 689 689 693 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
196% Outstanding
Read 748
Write 677
Mixed 708
SusWrite 687
159% 705 MB/s
4K Read 70.9
4K Write 133
4K Mixed 88.6
291% 97.4 MB/s
DQ Read 766
DQ Write 710
DQ Mixed 1,273
808% 916 MB/s
Poor: 266%
This bench: 196%
Great: 477%
Seagate Barracuda 8TB (2017)-$110
5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 153 157 153 155 154 148 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
72.6% Very good
Read 99.7
Write 130
Mixed 74.4
SusWrite 153
84% 114 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0
80% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 72.6%
Great: 90%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston Fury DDR5 6000 C36 2x16GB-$90
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h 4800 MHz clocked @ 6000 MHz
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
180% Outstanding
MC Read 73.5
MC Write 61.4
MC Mixed 61.9
187% 65.6 GB/s
SC Read 53.2
SC Write 65.6
SC Mixed 58.7
169% 59.2 GB/s
Latency 70.8
56% 70.8 ns
Poor: 141%
This bench: 180%
Great: 215%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Custom PC Builds (Compare 86 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 297%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 125%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 390%
UFO

System: Tactus Custom PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 92% - Outstanding Total price: $1,276
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $320
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback