HP 500-221eo

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics32.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive69.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (63%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP 500-221eo  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 2AF7
Memory8.8 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit farver
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140205
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 14 '23 at 14:46
Run Duration120 Seconds
Run User DNK-User
Background CPU 63%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4440-$128
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
51.4% Above average
Memory 70
1-Core 83.2
2-Core 138
58% 97 Pts
4-Core 188
8-Core 208
26% 198 Pts
64-Core 296
18% 296 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 51.4%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
32.4% Below average
Lighting 42.5
Reflection 40.4
Parallax 38.1
35% 40.3 fps
MRender 36.7
Gravity 41.3
Splatting 27.3
28% 35.1 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 32.4%
Great: 33%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$72
164GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 200 227 241 246 243 234 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
69.4% Good
Read 375
Write 276
Mixed 166
SusWrite 232
58% 262 MB/s
4K Read 21.3
4K Write 55.1
4K Mixed 21.6
89% 32.7 MB/s
DQ Read 345
DQ Write 252
DQ Mixed 79.2
119% 225 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 69.4%
Great: 118%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Nanya NT4GC64B8HB0NF-CG Micron 16JTF1G64AZ-1G6E1 12GB
1333, 1600 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
45.7% Average
MC Read 16
MC Write 17.3
MC Mixed 15.3
46% 16.2 GB/s
SC Read 11.3
SC Write 14.7
SC Mixed 13.2
37% 13.1 GB/s
Latency 101
39% 101 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 45.7%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 500-221eo Builds (Compare 17 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP 500-221eo

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $156
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback