CMS 7200-5792B

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 92%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 86%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics108% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive189% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (75%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemCMS 7200-5792B  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK PRIME B550M-A (WI-FI)
Memory17.9 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210909
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateApr 16 '23 at 13:04
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 75%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$84
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.95 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
85.7% Excellent
Memory 73.5
1-Core 132
2-Core 264
84% 156 Pts
4-Core 526
8-Core 844
84% 685 Pts
64-Core 1,003
62% 1,003 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 85.7%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$226
Asus(1043 8865) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3850 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 531.61
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Lighting 145
Reflection 167
Parallax 132
118% 148 fps
MRender 146
Gravity 103
Splatting 99.8
93% 116 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 108%
Great: 106%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$68
106GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 211210WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 663 413 294 278 289 295 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
189% Outstanding
Read 1437
Write 1,416
Mixed 902
SusWrite 372
230% 1,032 MB/s
4K Read 48
4K Write 137
4K Mixed 69.8
235% 85 MB/s
DQ Read 971
DQ Write 638
DQ Mixed 806
601% 805 MB/s
Poor: 152%
This bench: 189%
Great: 237%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4DFRA266.C8FE 3x8GB
3 of 4 slots used
24GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
53.1% Above average
MC Read 19.3
MC Write 17.4
MC Mixed 17.6
52% 18.1 GB/s
SC Read 19.1
SC Write 19.7
SC Mixed 18.5
55% 19.1 GB/s
Latency 93.6
43% 93.6 ns
Poor: 53%
This bench: 53.1%
Great: 83%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 7200-5792B Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 77%
Battleship

System: CMS 7200-5792B

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 99% - Outstanding Total price: $378
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $158
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback