Gigabyte H370 AORUS GAMING 3 WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 108%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 99%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics134% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive84.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (40%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemGigabyte H370AORUSGAMING3WIFI
MotherboardGigabyte H370 AORUS GAMING 3 WIFI  (all builds)
Memory1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180301
Uptime22 Days
Run DateApr 17 '23 at 15:35
Run Duration242 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 40%
Watch Gameplay: 3070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700-$186
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
81% Excellent
Memory 82.6
1-Core 118
2-Core 238
81% 146 Pts
4-Core 426
8-Core 751
71% 589 Pts
64-Core 849
53% 849 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 81%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$497
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 527.56
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
134% Outstanding
Lighting 191
Reflection 180
Parallax 174
156% 182 fps
MRender 174
Gravity 137
Splatting 122
116% 144 fps
Poor: 135%
This bench: 134%
Great: 158%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
394GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 325 364 374 391 395 392 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
84.6% Excellent
Read 409
Write 366
Mixed 310
SusWrite 374
82% 365 MB/s
4K Read 22.2
4K Write 50.1
4K Mixed 29.3
98% 33.9 MB/s
DQ Read 361
DQ Write 316
DQ Mixed 275
223% 317 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 84.6%
Great: 133%
PNY CS1311 240GB-$78
212GB free
Firmware: CS131122
SusWrite @10s intervals: 356 179 175 173 174 173 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
69.3% Good
Read 438
Write 413
Mixed 322
SusWrite 205
77% 345 MB/s
4K Read 19.3
4K Write 43.1
4K Mixed 22.8
81% 28.4 MB/s
DQ Read 324
DQ Write 317
DQ Mixed 198
182% 279 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 69.3%
Great: 97%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$24
530GB free
Firmware: CC44
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 110 112 112 113 112 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
84.6% Excellent
Read 183
Write 157
Mixed 80.9
SusWrite 112
98% 133 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
152% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 84.6%
Great: 112%
Tdas TerraMaster 4TB
3TB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 102 106 107 107 106 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 14% Great: 111%
Tdas TerraMaster 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 104 107 108 108 108 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 14% Great: 111%
Tdas TerraMaster 4TB
3TB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 104 107 108 108 108 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 14% Great: 111%
Tdas TerraMaster 1TB
589GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 103 105 106 108 106 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
76.9% Very good
Read 162
Write 144
Mixed 124
SusWrite 105
99% 134 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1.1
218% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 76.9%
Great: 77%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$48
1TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 145 148 147 150 153 146 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
76% Very good
Read 117
Write 154
Mixed 76.1
SusWrite 148
90% 124 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0
86% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 76%
Great: 106%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS8G4D30CESTK.8FD 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
68.1% Good
MC Read 28
MC Write 24.7
MC Mixed 21.8
71% 24.8 GB/s
SC Read 14.2
SC Write 19.1
SC Mixed 18.2
49% 17.2 GB/s
Latency 75.8
53% 75.8 ns
Poor: 54%
This bench: 68.1%
Great: 107%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H370 AORUS GAMING 3 WIFI-CF Builds (Compare 1,925 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 54%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 50%
Yacht

Motherboard: Gigabyte H370 AORUS GAMING 3 WIFI - $129

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 93% - Outstanding Total price: $560
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback