Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive	25.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	512GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 512GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 1,252 User benchmarks, average bench 66% CPU1, 2 CPU, 28 cores, 56 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	60.3% Good	Memory 53.5 1-Core 94 2-Core 188 60% 112 Pts	4-Core 359 8-Core 722 64% 541 Pts	64-Core 3289 204% 3289 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 60.3% Great: 74%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Dom-sl 3IE3 V2 64GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 38GB free (System drive) Firmware: S670330N SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 90 90 89 88 85 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	25.8% Poor	Read 206 Write 84.9 Mixed 98.2 SusWrite 88.5 26% 120 MB/s	4K Read 9.8 4K Write 23.9 4K Mixed 6.1 35% 13.3 MB/s	DQ Read 29.3 DQ Write 50.6 DQ Mixed 20.3 21% 33.4 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 25.8% Great: 36%
Samsung MZ7KM1T9 2TB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 1.5TB free Firmware: 0N6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 358 373 380 381 369 366 MB/s Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	87.5% Excellent	Read 423 Write 433 Mixed 360 SusWrite 371 89% 397 MB/s	4K Read 26.3 4K Write 56.4 4K Mixed 36.7 117% 39.8 MB/s	DQ Read 311 DQ Write 194 DQ Mixed 222 174% 243 MB/s
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 87.5% Great: 90%
Samsung MZ7KM1T9 2TB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 1.5TB free Firmware: 0N6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 355 371 380 376 363 364 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	82.7% Excellent	Read 400 Write 316 Mixed 332 SusWrite 368 80% 354 MB/s	4K Read 24.1 4K Write 50.5 4K Mixed 34.3 107% 36.3 MB/s	DQ Read 276 DQ Write 196 DQ Mixed 227 172% 233 MB/s
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 82.7% Great: 90%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393A4K40BB1-CRC 16x31.9GB 25 User benchmarks, average bench 122% 16 of 24 slots used 511GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	86.5% Excellent	MC Read 37.4 MC Write 35.8 MC Mixed 33.2 101% 35.5 GB/s	SC Read 8.5 SC Write 11 SC Mixed 9.6 28% 9.7 GB/s	Latency 148 27% 148 ns
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 86.5% Great: 175%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16