Today's hottest deals

Biostar H510MHP 2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics1.62% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive61.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardBiostar H510MHP 2.0  (all builds)
Memory11.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1776 x 1000 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220720
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateApr 18 '23 at 10:52
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User PAK-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10400F-$94
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
87.7% Excellent
Memory 92.1
1-Core 123
2-Core 245
86% 153 Pts
4-Core 449
8-Core 724
72% 586 Pts
64-Core 873
54% 873 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 87.7%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7450
HP(103C 90B7) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1101.1001
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
1.62% Terrible
Lighting 2
Reflection 2.5
Parallax 2
2% 2.17 fps
MRender 2
Gravity 1.9
Splatting 2
2% 1.97 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.62%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hs-ssd-desire(p) 512G 512GB
383GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 400fAA12
SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 49 11 60 48 55 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
61.1% Good
Read 511
Write 72.4
Mixed 82.4
SusWrite 45.5
38% 178 MB/s
4K Read 34.1
4K Write 40.6
4K Mixed 29.2
111% 34.6 MB/s
DQ Read 140
DQ Write 39.1
DQ Mixed 63.7
54% 81 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 61.1%
Great: 205%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Lexar Co Limited LD4AU008G-3200ST 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
81.9% Excellent
MC Read 32.3
MC Write 32
MC Mixed 22.6
83% 29 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 35.2
SC Mixed 24.5
72% 25.1 GB/s
Latency 63.9
63% 63.9 ns
Poor: 76%
This bench: 81.9%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H510MHP 2.0 Builds (Compare 351 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 85%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 77%
Battleship

Motherboard: Biostar H510MHP 2.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 92% - Outstanding Total price: $376
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $278WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback