Today's hottest deals

HP Pavilion 17 Notebook PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics8.69% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive30.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Pavilion 17 Notebook PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 2282
Memory10.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1600 x 900 - 32 Bit,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171023
Uptime5.9 Days
Run DateApr 18 '23 at 20:17
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4510U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 1.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
37.8% Below average
Memory 57.2
1-Core 62.5
2-Core 95.1
44% 71.6 Pts
4-Core 112
8-Core 91.8
14% 102 Pts
64-Core 102
6% 102 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 37.8%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 840M
HP(103C 2282) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 30.0.14.7219
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
8.69% Terrible
Lighting 11.8
Reflection 13.8
Parallax 10.6
10% 12.1 fps
MRender 5.1
Gravity 11.8
Splatting 8.2
7% 8.37 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 8.69%
Great: 10%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$112
16GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 90 79 72 71 69 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
30.3% Below average
Read 254
Write 85.3
Mixed 189
SusWrite 80.5
34% 152 MB/s
4K Read 10.2
4K Write 12.9
4K Mixed 9.8
35% 11 MB/s
DQ Read 138
DQ Write 64.2
DQ Mixed 87.4
68% 96.7 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 30.3%
Great: 124%
HGST Travelstar 5K1000 2.5" 1TB
156GB free
Firmware: JA0OA710
SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 41 45 47 48 48 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
35.3% Below average
Read 77.8
Write 67.5
Mixed 19.9
SusWrite 45.3
38% 52.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.3
62% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 35.3%
Great: 57%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT41GS6AFR8A-PB HMT41GS6AFR8C-PB 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
22.8% Poor
MC Read 8.1
MC Write 8.1
MC Mixed 7.1
22% 7.77 GB/s
SC Read 6.2
SC Write 7.7
SC Mixed 5.9
19% 6.6 GB/s
Latency 136
29% 136 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 22.8%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Pavilion 17 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 1,246 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: HP Pavilion 17 Notebook PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 23% - Poor Total price: $25
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback