Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 82KB

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics16.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive91.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemLenovo 82KB  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory5.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221116
Uptime7.7 Days
Run DateApr 19 '23 at 13:16
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-1165G7
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
55.6% Above average
Memory 56
1-Core 118
2-Core 192
67% 122 Pts
4-Core 297
8-Core 458
47% 378 Pts
64-Core 489
30% 489 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 55.6%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe
Legend(17AA 3F9C) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1692
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
16.3% Very poor
Lighting 19.4
Reflection 20.4
Parallax 23.7
16% 21.2 fps
MRender 20.1
Gravity 26.1
Splatting 18.1
17% 21.4 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 16.3%
Great: 20%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme Dahua E900 M.2 2280 1TB SSD
658GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T0918A0L Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 655 647 621 485 269 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
91.2% Outstanding
Read 602
Write 427
Mixed 220
SusWrite 470
96% 430 MB/s
4K Read 21.4
4K Write 47
4K Mixed 11.2
72% 26.5 MB/s
DQ Read 676
DQ Write 123
DQ Mixed 208
202% 336 MB/s
Poor: 91%
This bench: 91.2%
Great: 236%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43EB1-CWE M471A1G44AB0-CWE 16GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
48.5% Average
MC Read 15.3
MC Write 22.4
MC Mixed 13.9
49% 17.2 GB/s
SC Read 13.3
SC Write 25
SC Mixed 9.3
45% 15.9 GB/s
Latency 140
29% 140 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 48.5%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 82KB Builds (Compare 1,053 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 82KB

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $147
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback